Mitigating environmental externalities in livestock production through feed biotechnologies

被引:1
|
作者
Kaufman, James [2 ]
Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Econ & Management Agrobiotechnol Ctr, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Phosphorus; Phytate; Phytase; Biotechnology; Nutrient management; Regulation; IMPROVES NUTRIENT UTILIZATION; AVAILABLE-PHOSPHORUS CORN; SOYBEAN MEAL DIETS; LOW-PHYTATE CORN; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; GROWING PIGS; BIOAVAILABILITY; DIGESTIBILITY; GENE; EXCRETION;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2011.07.002
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
New low phytate crop varieties have been heralded for their potential to assist animal producers manage phosphorus (P) as both an input cost and as an environmental externality. This paper investigates the economic viability of such biotechnologies under regulations that attempt to minimize fecal P pollution by limiting land application of manure. Such restrictions often require animal feeding operations to spread manure over larger areas, thus increasing cost. To assess the economics of P mitigation, the production, handling, spreading, and vegetative uptake of manure nutrients for a variety of livestock growing operations was simulated. The simulation concludes that low phytate crops can be effective at mitigating P in situations where manure spreading geography is significantly restricted. However, alternative technologies such as phytase appear to offer a lower cost mechanism for mitigating P in most situations. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 780
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recoupling livestock and feed production in the Netherlands to reduce environmental impacts
    van Selm, Benjamin
    Hijbeek, Renske
    van Ittersum, Martin K.
    van Hal, Ollie
    van Middelaar, Corina E.
    de Boer, Imke J. M.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 899
  • [2] Application of reproductive biotechnologies for sustainable production of livestock in Turkey
    Kaya, Abdullah
    Gunes, Erdogan
    Memili, Erdogan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2018, 42 (03): : 143 - 151
  • [3] Compound feed production for livestock
    Shrinivasa, D. J.
    Mathur, S. M.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2020, 118 (04): : 553 - 559
  • [4] IMPACT OF FEED IN LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION
    DEBOER, F
    BICKEL, H
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1988, 19 (1-2): : 3 - 10
  • [5] Reducing feed environmental impacts for livestock
    Wilfart, Aurelie
    Dusart, Leonie
    Meda, Bertrand
    Gac, Armelle
    Espagnol, Sandrine
    Morin, Laurent
    Dronne, Yves
    Garcia-Launay, Florence
    INRA PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES, 2018, 31 (03): : 289 - 306
  • [6] Insects as feed for livestock production Insect farming for livestock feed has the potential to replace conventional feed
    van Huis, Arnold
    Gasco, Laura
    SCIENCE, 2023, 379 (6628) : 138 - 139
  • [7] ANTIBIOTIC FEED ADDITIVES AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION
    PARKER, DS
    ARMSTRONG, DG
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 1987, 46 (03) : 415 - 421
  • [8] Decoupling Livestock from Land Use through Industrial Feed Production Pathways
    Pikaar, Ilje
    Matassa, Silvio
    Bodirsky, Benjamin L.
    Weindl, Isabelle
    Humpenoeder, Florian
    Rabaey, Korneel
    Boon, Nico
    Bruschi, Michele
    Yuan, Zhiguo
    van Zanten, Hannah
    Herrero, Mario
    Verstraete, Willy
    Popp, Alexander
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (13) : 7351 - 7359
  • [9] MITIGATING ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES THROUGH VOLUNTARY AND INVOLUNTARY WATER REALLOCATION - NEVADAS TRUCKEE-CARSON RIVER BASIN
    COLBY, BG
    MCGINNIS, MA
    RAIT, KA
    NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 1991, 31 (04) : 757 - 783
  • [10] Livestock GRACEnet: A Workgroup Dedicated to Evaluating and Mitigating Emissions from Livestock Production
    Leytem, April B.
    Dungan, Robert S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2014, 43 (04) : 1101 - 1110