Successful referral behavior in referral reward programs

被引:28
|
作者
Wirtz, Jochen [1 ]
Tang, Chris [2 ]
Georgi, Dominik [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mkt, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Decis Sci, Anderson Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Lucerne Business Sch, Luzern, Switzerland
关键词
Incentives; Opportunism; Customer segmentation; Metaperception; Referral reward programme; Reward attractiveness; WORD-OF-MOUTH; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; SWITCHING BEHAVIOR; SELF-DETERMINATION; INTENTIONS; DRIVERS; ANTECEDENTS; RETENTION; SERVICES; LOYALTY;
D O I
10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0111
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Referral reward programs (RRPs) incentivize existing customers (inductors) to refer new customers (inductees). The effectiveness of RRPs is not well understood as previous studies either focused on referral intent and/or ignored inductee responses. However, an RRP is only effective if inductors recommend and inductees respond with buying the service. The purpose of this paper is to examine the drivers of existing customers' successful referral behavior. Design/methodology/approach This study combines a bank's customer relationship management (CRM) data which were used to identify successful inductors and non-inductors. Then, observed behavioral and customer background data from the CRM database (including successful referrals, deposits in euros, number of products held, relationship duration, income, age, and gender) were combined with survey data capturing attitudinal variables (i.e. perceived relationship quality, reward attractiveness, referral metaperception, opportunism, and involvement). This approach allowed for the simultaneous testing of all hypothesized drivers of successful referral behavior. Findings Metaperception (i.e. the process by which individuals determine the impressions other might form of them and their behavior) was the strongest and most significant driver of successful RRP participation, followed by attractiveness of the reward. That is, inductors recommended successfully when they believed that their incentivized referral did not look bad (or even looked good) and incentives were perceived as attractive. This finding is important as metaperception so far has only been examined in theoretical and experimental studies with intent as dependent variables. Second, latent class analysis (LCA) revealed that there were two segments of inductors of which one was opportunistic. Opportunism as a driver of referral behavior has not been shown in past research using more traditional analyses, whereas LCA uncovered it as a driver for one-third of all respondents. Practical implications - The findings offer managers a better understanding of the key determinants of successful referral behavior with important RRP design implications that counter frequent practice (e.g. designing RRPs with high face value but then reducing its usefulness through terms and conditions). Furthermore, managers may consider segment-specific reward structures to improve the effectiveness of their RRPs. Originality/value - This study is the first to examine inductor determinants of successful referral behavior and identify inductor segments.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 74
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REFERRAL REWARD PROGRAMS FOR SPECIALISTS: THE ROLE OF REWARD AND BRAND STRENGTH ON REFERRAL LIKELIHOOD
    Pizzutti, Cristiane
    de Oliveira, Guilherme Possebon
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MARKETING, 2022, 21 (05): : 1730 - 1786
  • [2] A penny for your thoughts: Referral reward programs and referral likelihood
    Ryu, Gangseog
    Feick, Lawrence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2007, 71 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [3] The Role of Metaperception on the Effectiveness of Referral Reward Programs
    Wirtz, Jochen
    Orsingher, Chiara
    Chew, Patricia
    Tambyah, Siok Kuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2013, 16 (01) : 82 - 98
  • [4] Customer referral management: Optimal reward programs
    Biyalogorsky, E
    Gerstner, E
    Libai, B
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2001, 20 (01) : 82 - 95
  • [5] Reward-scrounging in customer referral programs
    Meyners, Jannik
    Barrot, Christian
    Becker, Jan U.
    Bodapati, Anand V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2017, 34 (02) : 382 - 398
  • [6] The role of risk preference in referral reward programs
    Wang, Tuo
    Song, Chanho
    Hu, Michael Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023,
  • [7] Examining Customer Referral Reward Programs: Does Reward Fairness Matter?
    Dose, David
    Walsh, Gianfranco
    [J]. REDISCOVERING THE ESSENTIALITY OF MARKETING, 2016, : 893 - 893
  • [8] Receiver responses to referral reward programs in social networks
    Qi Wang
    Yunxia Mao
    Ji Zhu
    Xiaohang Zhang
    [J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2018, 18 : 563 - 585
  • [9] Receiver responses to referral reward programs in social networks
    Wang, Qi
    Mao, Yunxia
    Zhu, Ji
    Zhang, Xiaohang
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2018, 18 (03) : 563 - 585
  • [10] Engaging customers through online and offline referral reward programs
    Wirtz, Jochen
    Orsingher, Chiara
    Cho, Hichang
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2019, 53 (09) : 1962 - 1987