The more we get together, the more we can save? A transaction cost perspective

被引:35
|
作者
Li, Chia-Ying [1 ]
Fang, Yu-Hui [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taichung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Tamkang Univ, Dept Accounting, 151 Yingzhuan Rd, New Taipei 25137, Taiwan
关键词
Transaction cost theory; Network externalities; Sharing economy; SHARING ECONOMY; NETWORK EXTERNALITIES; COLLABORATIVE CONSUMPTION; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; BUSINESS MODELS; SWITCHING COSTS; PERSONALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES; REPURCHASE INTENTION; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; CONSUMER ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102434
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Although sharing is not a new subject, sharing behavior enabled by peer-to-peer software technologies is a recent phenomenon. Studies have explored the impact of the sharing economy on consumers by applying the theory of planned behavior, complexity theory, and social exchange theory, but few studies have explored transaction costs in the sharing economy. By integrating network externalities with transaction cost theory, this study ex-plores transaction costs and their determinants in the context of the sharing economy. Structural equation modeling analysis was conducted on data from 375 users of Airbnb. The findings indicate that personalization of asset specificity and transaction frequency negatively influence transaction costs. Additionally, learning of asset specificity and transaction uncertainty positively affects transaction costs, which in turn influence behavioral intention. Furthermore, perceived complementarity has a direct effect on transaction uncertainty. Finally, the number of users moderates the relationship between transaction costs and behavioral intention. This under-standing will assist managers in numerous industries impacted by the rapid development of the sharing economy by providing them with strategies for coping with this trend.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The More We Get Together
    可乐
    [J]. 阅读, 2020, (36) : 48 - 48
  • [2] THE MORE WE GET TOGETHER
    INGALLS, L
    ISSOTT, F
    [J]. ELEMENTARY ENGLISH, 1961, 38 (08): : 561 - &
  • [3] Can we save more lives?
    Ness, Ewa
    Skotte, Jon Ragnar
    Christensen, Tore Buer
    Andresen, Jan Fredrik
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2020, 140 (08) : 767 - 769
  • [4] TOGETHER WE CAN DO MORE
    Smilenova, Diana
    [J]. PEDAGOGIKA-PEDAGOGY, 2014, 86 (07): : 1008 - 1014
  • [5] The More We Give, the More We Get
    Mascone, Cynthia F.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2011, 107 (04) : 3 - 3
  • [6] The More We Get Together, The More We Learn: Focus on Intergenerational and Collaborative Learning Through Singing
    Beynon, Carol
    Lang, Jennifer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERGENERATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2018, 16 (1-2) : 45 - 63
  • [7] HOW CAN WE GET MORE DONORS
    RUDGE, C
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1989, 42 (03): : 171 - 171
  • [8] HOW CAN WE GET MORE DONORS
    SEARLE, JF
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1989, 42 (05): : 426 - 426
  • [9] THE MORE PLASTICS WE USE, THE MORE ENERGY WE SAVE
    HARDING, RL
    [J]. CHEMTECH, 1983, 13 (07) : 386 - 387
  • [10] The More We Get Together: Communities of Practice for Behaviour Analysts
    Busch, Louis
    Zonneveld, Kimberley
    Saini, Valdeep
    Chartier, Karen
    Leathen, Nancy
    Asaro, Madeline
    Feltz, Nick
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 2020, 52 (04): : 277 - 284