Manager-Union Bargaining Agenda Under Monopoly and with Network Effects

被引:4
|
作者
Fanti, Luciano [1 ]
Buccella, Domenico [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Econ & Management, Pisa, PI, Italy
[2] Kozminski Univ, Dept Econ, Ul Jagiellonska 57-59, PL-03301 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
STRATEGIC DELEGATION; MARKET SHARE; OLIGOPOLY; COMPETITION; EXTERNALITIES; UNIONIZATION; INCENTIVES; EMPLOYMENT; FIRM; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/mde.2809
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the bargaining agenda selection in a unionised monopoly with managerial delegation (MD). In contrast to the conventional wisdom, monopoly profits with MD under sequential Efficient Bargaining (SEB) exceed those under Right-to-Manage (RTM), while the union can prefer RTM to SEB: paradoxically, a conflict of interests between the parties may still exist but for reversed choices of the agenda. Consumption externalities change the picture. The monopolist still prefers SEB; however, provided that network effects are sufficiently strong, the union prefers SEB even for a relatively low bargaining power. Thus, the parties endogenously choose the SEB agenda which is also Pareto-superior. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 730
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BARGAINING AGENDA AND PRIVATE MONOPOLY
    Fanti, Luciano
    Buccella, Domenico
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD), 2016, : 51 - 62
  • [2] Bargaining Agenda in a Unionized Bilateral Monopoly
    Fanti, Luciano
    Buccella, Domenico
    [J]. LABOUR-ENGLAND, 2019, 33 (04): : 450 - 462
  • [3] Bargaining agenda in a unionised monopoly with network effects: when corporate social responsibility may be welfare-reducing
    Fanti, Luciano
    Buccella, Domenico
    [J]. ECONOMIA POLITICA, 2017, 34 (03) : 471 - 489
  • [4] Bargaining agenda in a unionised monopoly with network effects: when corporate social responsibility may be welfare-reducing
    Luciano Fanti
    Domenico Buccella
    [J]. Economia Politica, 2017, 34 : 471 - 489
  • [5] Bargaining Agenda and Entry in a Unionised Model with Network Effects
    Fanti L.
    Buccella D.
    [J]. Italian Economic Journal, 2016, 2 (1) : 91 - 121
  • [6] BARGAINING - MONOPOLY VERSUS UNION POWER - MENIL,GD
    BOIVIN, J
    [J]. RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1973, 28 (01): : 222 - 223
  • [7] BARGAINING - MONOPOLY POWER VERSUS UNION POWER - MENIL,GD
    TAIRA, K
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1973, 410 (NOV): : 240 - 241
  • [8] BARGAINING - MONOPOLY POWER VERSUS UNION POWER - MENIL,GD
    WICKENS, MR
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1973, 83 (332): : 1340 - 1341
  • [9] BARGAINING - MONOPOLY POWER VERSUS UNION POWER - MENIL,GD
    ANNABLE, JE
    [J]. SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1972, 14 (01): : 111 - 112
  • [10] BARGAINING - MONOPOLY POWER VERSUS UNION POWER - DEMENIL,G
    LEVINSON, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1973, 46 (03): : 474 - 475