CSR motives on situational scepticism towards luxury brands

被引:9
|
作者
Teah, Kevin [1 ]
Sung, Billy [1 ]
Phau, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Luxury brands; Scepticism; Motives; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ATTRIBUTIONS; CONSUMPTION; ATTRACTIVENESS; COMMUNICATION; ATTITUDES; BUSINESS; BEHAVIOR; VALUES; FIT;
D O I
10.1108/MIP-05-2021-0143
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) motives may influence situational scepticism towards luxury brands and its effects on brand resonance, resilience to negative information and consumer advocacy of luxury brands. The moderating role of perceived fit towards luxury brand CSR initiatives is also investigated. Design/methodology/approach An experimental approach on a 2 x 2 matrix was used. Data are collected through a consumer panel. Findings Values-driven motives were found to lead to lower consumer situational scepticism and egoistic-driven motives would lead to higher levels of consumer situational scepticism. While higher consumer situational scepticism leads to lower brand resonance, there is no significant relationship between scepticism and resilience to negative information and consumer advocacy. The findings also suggest that perceived fit moderates the relationship between consumer situational scepticism to resilience to negative information and consumer situational scepticism to consumer advocacy. Originality/value The key originality of the study is that it provides empirical insights into situational scepticism of CSR initiatives and its influence in consumer and management outcomes in luxury brands.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CSR commitment and consumer situational scepticism of luxury brands: antecedents, moderator and outcomes
    Teah, Kevin
    Phau, Ian
    Sung, Billy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2023,
  • [2] Examining the moderating role of principle-based entity of luxury brands and its effects on perceived CSR motives, consumer situational scepticism and brand resonance
    Teah, Kevin
    Sung, Billy
    Phau, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FASHION MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 27 (05) : 784 - 809
  • [3] Is It Beneficial for Luxury Brands to Embrace CSR Practices?
    Dekhili, Sihem
    Achabou, Mohamed Akli
    [J]. CELEBRATING AMERICA'S PASTIMES: BASEBALL, HOT DOGS, APPLE PIE AND MARKETING?, 2016, : 3 - 18
  • [4] Does Fashionization Impede Luxury Brands' CSR Image?
    Parguel, Beatrice
    Delecolle, Thierry
    Chaabane, Aida Mimouni
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [5] Luxury brands' use of CSR and femvertising: the case of jewelry advertising
    Pankiw, Stephanie A.
    Phillips, Barbara J.
    Williams, David E.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH, 2021, 24 (03): : 302 - 325
  • [6] Luxury brands and corporate social responsibility (CSR): exploring the differences between traditional and new luxury
    Kwon, Jung Eun
    Kim, Jongdae
    Kim, Sang-Hoon
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2024, 36 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [7] Towards the conceptualisation of the antecedents of extreme negative affect towards luxury brands
    Bryson, Douglas
    Atwal, Glyn
    Hulten, Peter
    [J]. QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH, 2013, 16 (04): : 393 - +
  • [8] The Concept of Luxury Brands and the Relationship between Consumer and Luxury Brands
    Becker, Kip
    Lee, Jung Wan
    Nobre, Helena M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2018, 5 (03): : 51 - 63
  • [9] Consumers' perceptions of luxury brands' CSR initiatives: An investigation of the role of status and conspicuous consumption
    Amatulli, Cesare
    De Angelis, Matteo
    Korschun, Daniel
    Romani, Simona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 194 : 277 - 287
  • [10] Impact of the awareness of brand-related CSR activities on purchase intention for luxury brands
    Olsanova, Kveta
    Rios, Andrea Escobar
    Cook, Gina
    Kral, Petr
    Zlatic, Marija
    [J]. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (03) : 597 - 618