Digital Authoritarianism: Conceptual Foundations and a Model of Legitimation

被引:0
|
作者
Yakovlev, Maksim, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Fac Philosophy, Dept Philosophy Polit & Law, 1 Leninskie Gory,GSP 1, Moscow 119991, Russia
关键词
machine algorithms; internet; cyberspace; model of legitimation; noopolitik; network authoritarianism; philosophical foundations; digital authoritarianism; digital transformation; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.21146/0042-8744-2022-8-45-54
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
One of the important effects of digital transformation is the expansion of digital authoritarianism, which causes a noticeable transformation at all levels (global, national, local) in different socio- political systems. The article defines the concept, philosophical foundations, and model of legitimation of digital and network authoritarianism. The author substantiates the thesis that intelligent technical systems in autocracies support, first of all, the inviolability of the regime on the basis of control over big data, exploitation of sadomasochistic tendencies in society, propaganda through new media and social networks, mechanisms of instrumental and pragmatic consent. Together, these tools create a specific interface of the digital world the emblems of which are passivity and fear, and the installation is a blind belief that what is happening is the norm. It is suggested that as a result of the expansion of authoritarianism in cyberspace, many citizens are forced to independently protect themselves and their property by digital means such as VPN technologies and "onion routing" or using a Hidden Network (Darknet). The digital confrontation between ordinary users and the ruling class (for example, in the form of street protests organized through social networks and messengers) intensifies at the intersection of virtual and material realities. Reflection on these phenomena allows us to give well-founded answers to the questions about the nature and direction of digital transformation in the sphere of state and law, to make reasonable forecasts, to help the public understand the grounds and methods of controlling influence by which the government is held, which programs the consciousness and behavior of citizens.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 54
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A model for clarification and expansion of conceptual foundations
    Ambrose, D
    [J]. GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 1998, 42 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [2] Legitimation in practice: A new digital publishing business model
    Laifi, Amira
    Josserand, Emmanuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (07) : 2343 - 2352
  • [3] A conceptual model for reliability analysis of pavement foundations
    Teixeira, A.
    Gomes Correia, A.
    Gaspar, A.
    Henriques, A. A.
    Honjo, Y.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS II, 2012, : 829 - 835
  • [4] Conceptual foundations and global challenges in the formation of digital sovereignty of the state
    Iakhiaev, Dilmurad
    Grigorishchin, Aleksei
    Voronina, Lyudmila
    Dementeva, Diana
    Ivanova, Irina
    [J]. NEXO REVISTA CIENTIFICA, 2023, 36 (05): : 169 - 179
  • [5] Mass Persuasion as a Means of Legitimation and China's Popular Authoritarianism
    Brady, Anne-Marie
    [J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2009, 53 (03) : 434 - 457
  • [6] Digital Sustainability in Information Systems Research: Conceptual Foundations and Future Directions
    Kotlarsky, Julia
    Oshri, Ilan
    Sekulic, Nevena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 24 (04): : 936 - 952
  • [7] Model-Supported Business Alignment of IT - Conceptual Foundations
    Juhrisch, Martin
    Schlieter, Hannes
    Dietz, Gunnar
    [J]. AMCIS 2011 PROCEEDINGS, 2011,
  • [8] Varieties of Digital Authoritarianism
    Howells, Laura
    Henry, Laura A.
    [J]. COMMUNIST AND POST-COMMUNIST STUDIES, 2021, 54 (04) : 1 - 27
  • [9] Defining Digital Authoritarianism
    James S. Pearson
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2024, 37 (2)
  • [10] AUTHORITARIANISM AND CONCEPTUAL FUNCTIONING IN VARIED CONDITIONS
    HARVEY, OJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1963, 31 (04) : 462 - 470