共 20 条
Does group-based cognitive therapy improve functional ability, pain, catastrophic thoughts and quality of life in patients with persistent low back pain and psychological risk factors? A randomised controlled trial in a secondary care setting
被引:6
|作者:
Rolving, Nanna
[1
,2
,3
]
Agerbo, Karina
[2
]
Clausen, Stine Aalkjaer
[2
]
Denby, Kate Ane Rauff
[2
]
Jacobsen, Anna Puk
[4
,5
]
Langagergaard, Vivian
[2
,5
]
机构:
[1] Cent Denmark Reg, Corp Qual, DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Silkeborg Reg Hosp, Spine Ctr, Diagnost Ctr, Silkeborg, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Municipal, Dept Social Affairs & Employment, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Clin Social Med & Rehabil, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词:
Low back pain;
rehabilitation interventions;
randomized controlled trial;
psychological factors;
disability;
FEAR-AVOIDANCE;
BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS;
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN;
CLINICAL-PRACTICE;
DISABILITY;
VALIDATION;
GUIDELINES;
EXERCISES;
MODEL;
SCALE;
D O I:
10.1177/02692155211056202
中图分类号:
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号:
100215 ;
摘要:
Objective To investigate the effects of a group-based cognitive behavioural intervention for patients with persistent low back pain (LBP) and psychological risk factors referred to secondary care. Design A randomised controlled trial. Setting Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Denmark. Subjects A total of 136 participants with chronic LBP and psychological risk factors. Interventions Participants were randomised to the standard care group, including examination by a rheumatologist and/or a physiotherapist, or the intervention group, including standard care plus a multidisciplinary group-based pain management programme. Main measures Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included low back pain intensity, pain catastrophising, health-related quality of life, and sick leave. Results Among 136 participants, 68 (mean age: 41.7 years (SD 11.8)) were randomised to standard care and 68 (mean age: 46.0 years (SD 10.8)) were randomised to the intervention group. Except for age, baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. 12-month follow-up was completed by 92.6% in the intervention group and 80.9% in the standard care group. Both groups achieved significant improvements on disability, with a reduction of -4.8 points (SD 6.1) in the intervention group compared to -3.7 points (SD 5.2), resulting in an insignificant difference between groups. No significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion A group-based pain management programme was no more effective than standard care for patients with persistent LBP and psychological risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 330
页数:14
相关论文