共 50 条
Outcome after liver transplantation in elderly recipients (>65 years) - A single-center retrospective analysis
被引:11
|作者:
Kollmann, Dagmar
[1
]
Maschke, Svenja
[1
]
Rasoul-Rockenschaub, Susanne
[1
,2
]
Baron-Stefaniak, Joanna
[3
]
Hofmann, Michael
[1
]
Silberhumer, Gerd
[1
]
Gyoeri, Georg P.
[1
]
Soliman, Thomas
[1
]
Berlakovich, Gabriela A.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Stat Informat & Intelligent Syst, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Anaesthesia Intens Care Med & Pain Med, Vienna, Austria
关键词:
Elderly recipients;
Liver transplantation;
Outcome;
Recipients > 65 years;
CENTRAL VENOUS-PRESSURE;
LONG-TERM OUTCOMES;
CENTER-EXPERIENCE;
OCTOGENARIAN DONORS;
ORGAN ALLOCATION;
GRAFT-SURVIVAL;
AGE;
OLDER;
RISK;
MELD;
D O I:
10.1016/j.dld.2018.06.018
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) in elderly recipients is controversially discussed in the literature with only little data on long-term outcome available. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of LT in elderly recipients (>65 years). Methods: Between 1989-2016, 139 patients >65 years-old were listed for liver transplantation, and 76 (55%) were transplanted. Patient outcome and characteristics were evaluated separately for the time period before (1989-2004) and after (2005-2016) MELD-implementation. Post-transplant outcome was compared between the elderly cohort and LT-recipients aged 18-65 years (n = 1395). Results: Overall survival of patients >65 years was better in the MELD-era compared to the earlier period (1-and 5-year-survival: 73%, 60% vs. 69%, 37%, respectively; p = 0.055). The main differences between the two groups included higher recipient age (p = 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.001), higher donor age (p < 0.001), less need of intraoperative red blood cells (p = 0.008) and a lower number of postoperative rejections (p = 0.03) after 2004. Comparing the overall survival of patients transplanted in the MELD-era aged 18-65 years vs. >65 years displayed comparable 1-and 5 year-survival rates (81%, 68% vs. 73% and 60%, respectively, p = 0.558). Conclusion: In the modern era, outcome of patients receiving LT with >65 years is comparable to < 65 year-old patients. After careful evaluation, patients >65 years old should be considered for LT. (c) 2018 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1055
页数:7
相关论文