Utilisation of remote capillary blood testing in an outpatient clinic setting to improve shared decision making and patient and clinician experience: a validation and pilot study

被引:13
|
作者
Nwankwo, Lisa [1 ]
McLaren, Kate [2 ]
Donovan, Jackie [3 ]
Ni, Zhifang [4 ]
Vidal-Diaz, Alberto [4 ]
Loebinger, Michael [2 ,5 ]
Morrisey, Alice [6 ]
Igra, Adam [6 ]
Shah, Anand [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Fdn Trust, Pharm, London, England
[2] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Resp Med, London, England
[3] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Pathol, London, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, Fac Med, London, England
[5] Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[6] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[7] Imperial Coll, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal, London, England
关键词
health services research; laboratory medicine; quality improvement; PDSA; outpatients; BIOCHEMISTRY; QUALITY; SERUM;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001192
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In a tertiary respiratory centre, large cohorts of patients are managed in an outpatient setting and require blood tests to monitor disease activity and organ toxicity. This requires either visits to tertiary centres for phlebotomy and physician review or utilisation of primary care services. Objectives This study aims to validate remote capillary blood testing in an outpatient setting and analyse impact on clinical pathways. Methods A single-centre prospective cross-sectional validation and parallel observational study was performed. Remote finger prick capillary blood testing was validated compared with local standard venesection using comparative statistical analysis: paired t-test, correlation and Bland-Altman. Capillary was considered interchangeable with venous samples if all three criteria were met: non-significant paired t-test (ie, p>0.05), Pearson's correlation coefficient (r)>0.8% and 95% of tests within 10% difference through Bland-Altman (limits of agreement). In parallel, current clinical pathways including phlebotomy practice were analysed over 4 weeks to review test predictability. A subsequent pilot cohort study analysed potential impact of remote capillary blood sampling on shared decision making. A final implementation phase ensued to embed the service into clinical pathways within the institution. Results 117 paired capillary and venous blood samples were prospectively analysed. Interchangeability with venous blood was seen with glycated haemoglobin (%), total protein and C reactive protein. Further tests, although not interchangeable, are likely useful to enable longitudinal remote monitoring (eg, liver function and total IgE). 65% of outpatient clinic blood tests were predictable with 16% of patients requiring further follow-up. Patient and clinician-reported improvement in shared decision making given contemporaneous blood test results was observed. Conclusions Remote capillary blood sampling can be used accurately for specific tests to monitor chronic disease, and when incorporated into an outpatient clinical pathway can improve shared decision making and patient experience. Further research is required to determine health economic impact and applicability within telemedicine-based outpatient care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Shared decision-making in spine surgery: pilot study of the use of patient reported outcomes to improve decision-making
    Skolasky, Richard
    Neuman, Brian
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S168 - S169
  • [2] Impact of shared decision making on improving patient-clinician interactions and ms quality measures: a pilot study
    Rudell, E.
    Ambeskovic, A.
    Ingram, M. F.
    Oliver, B. J.
    Elwyn, G.
    Bowen, J. D.
    Severson, B.
    Repovic, P.
    Qian, P.
    Machemer, D.
    Shankar, S.
    Sih-Meynier, R.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2018, 24 : 734 - 735
  • [3] Is patient behavior during consultation associated with shared decision-making? A study of patients' questions, cues and concerns in relation to observed shared decision-making in a cancer outpatient clinic
    Amundsen, Anita
    Nordoy, Tone
    Lingen, Kristine Emilie
    Sorlie, Tore
    Bergvik, Svein
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2018, 101 (03) : 399 - 405
  • [4] A pilot study testing the effectiveness, feasibility, and fidelity of implementing a shared decision making visit for lung cancer screening in the screening setting
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Godoy, Myrna Cobos Barco
    Zirari, Zineb
    Leal, Viola B.
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Erasmus, Jeremy J.
    Volk, Robert J.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 13
  • [5] A pilot study testing the effectiveness, feasibility, and fidelity of implementing a shared decision making visit for lung cancer screening in the screening setting
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Godoy, Myrna Cobos Barco
    Zirari, Zineb
    Leal, Viola B.
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Erasmus, Jeremy J.
    Volk, Robert J.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [6] Using a novel patient decision aid to improve the quality of pregnancy-related shared decision making in inflammatory bowel disease: A pilot study
    Willmann, L.
    Wang, G.
    Karimi, N.
    Connor, S.
    Descallar, J.
    Kanazaki, R.
    Ng, W.
    O'Connor, K.
    Pipicella, J. L.
    Huang, V.
    Williams, A-J
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 : 143 - 143
  • [7] Can consumers learn to ask three questions to improve shared decision making? A feasibility study of the ASK (AskShareKnow) Patient-Clinician Communication Model® intervention in a primary health-care setting
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Jones, Anna
    Bateson, Deborah
    Carey, Karen
    Trevena, Lyndal J.
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Del Mar, Chris B.
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Epstein, Ronald M.
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Weisberg, Edith
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2016, 19 (05) : 1160 - 1168