Comparison of projection neurons in the pontine nuclei and the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis of the rat

Dendritic features of identified projection neurons in two precerebellar nuclei, the pontine nuclei (PN) and the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis (NRTP) were established by using a combination of retrograde tracing (injection of fluorogold or rhodamine labelled latex microspheres into the cerebellum) with subsequent intracellular filling (lucifer yellow) in fixed slices of pontine brainstem. A multivariate analysis revealed that parameters selected to characterize the dendritic tree such as size of dendritic field, number of branching points, and length of terminal dendrites did not deviate significantly between different regions of the PN and the NRTP. On the other hand, projection neurons in ventral regions of the PN were characterized by an irregular coverage of their distal dendrites by appendages while those in the dorsal PN and the NRTP were virtually devoid of them. The NRTP, dorsal, and medial PN tended to display larger somata and more primary dendrites than ventral regions of the PN. These differences, however, do not allow the differentiation of projection neurons within the PN from those in the NRTP. They rather reflect a dorso-ventral gradient ignoring the border between the nuclei. Accordingly, a cluster analysis did not differentiate distinct types of projection neurons within the total sample. In both nuclei, multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the size of dendritic fields was strongly correlated with the length of terminal dendrites while it did not depend on other parameters of the dendritic field. Thus, larger dendritic fields seem not to be accompanied by a higher complexity but rather may be used to extend the reach of a projection neuron within the arrangement of afferent terminals. We suggest that these similarities within dendritic properties in PN and NRTP projection neurons reflect similar processing of afferent information in both precerebellar nuclei. (C) 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.