Evaluation of maize inbred lines and topeross progeny for resistance to pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination

被引:10
|
作者
Fountain, Jake C. [1 ,2 ]
Abbas, Hamed K. [3 ]
Scully, Brian T. [4 ]
Li, Hong [5 ]
Lee, Robert D. [6 ]
Kemerait, Robert C. [2 ]
Guo, Baozhu [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Crop Protect & Management Res Unit, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Plant Pathol, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Biol Control Pests Res Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
[4] USDA ARS, Natl Hort Res Lab, Ft Pierce, FL USA
[5] Shanxi Acad Agr Sci, Millet Res Inst, Changzhi, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Tifton, GA USA
来源
CROP JOURNAL | 2019年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
Aspergillus flavus; Pre-harvest; Aflatoxin; Maize; Topeross; ASPERGILLUS EAR ROT; GERMPLASM LINES; REGISTRATION; ACCUMULATION; FLAVUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cj.2018.10.001
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination occurs in maize following kernel colonization by Aspergillus flavus. Aflatoxin contamination resistance is a highly desired trait in maize breeding programs. The identification of novel sources of resistance to pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination is a major focus in germplasm screening efforts. Here, we performed a field evaluation of 64 inbred lines over two years for pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination. Toperosses were also performed with two testers, B73 and Mo17, to generate 128 F-1 hybrids which were also evaluated over two years. Hybrid performance was used to calculate both general combining ability (GCA) of the inbreds, and observed heterosis for aflatoxin resistance. Over both years of the study, aflatoxin concentrations ranged from 80 +/- 47 to 17,617 +/- 8816 mu g kg(-1) for inbreds, and from 58 +/- 39 to 2771 +/- 780 mu g kg(-1) for hybrids with significant variation between years and lines. The inbred lines CML52, CML69, CML247, CT-603, GEMS-0005, Hi63, Hp301, and M37 W showed <1000 p g kg(-1) of aflatoxin accumulation in both years of the study and less than the resistant check, Mp313E, in at least one season. Among these, CML52, CT-603, and Hi63 also showed significant GCA with the testers in hybrid progeny. CML52, CT-603, and M37 W also showed heterotic effects of-13.64%, -12.47%, and- 24.50%, respectively, with B73 resulting in reduced aflatoxin contamination. CT 603 also showed a similar heterotic effect for aflatoxin contamination,-13.11%, with Mo17 indicating that this line may serve as a versatile source of aflatoxin contamination resistance in breeding programs. (C) 2018 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 125
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of maize inbred lines and topcross progeny for resistance to pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination
    Jake C.Fountain
    Hamed K.Abbas
    Brian T.Scully
    Hong Li
    Robert D.Lee
    Robert C.Kemerait
    Baozhu Guo
    TheCropJournal, 2019, 7 (01) : 118 - 125
  • [2] Evaluation of maize inbred lines for resistance to pre-harvest aflatoxin and fumonisin contamination in the field
    Guo, Baozhu
    Ji, Xiangyun
    Ni, Xinzhi
    Fountain, Jake C.
    Li, Hong
    Abbas, Hamed K.
    Lee, Robert D.
    Scully, Brian T.
    CROP JOURNAL, 2017, 5 (03): : 259 - 264
  • [3] Evaluation of maize inbred lines for resistance to pre-harvest aflatoxin and fumonisin contamination in the field
    Baozhu Guo
    Xiangyun Ji
    Xinzhi Ni
    Jake C.Fountain
    Hong Li
    Hamed K.Abbas
    Robert D.Lee
    Brian T.Scully
    TheCropJournal, 2017, 5 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [4] Pre-harvest management is a critical practice for minimizing aflatoxin contamination of maize
    Mahuku, George
    Nzioki, Henry Sila
    Mutegi, Charity
    Kanampiu, Fred
    Narrod, Clare
    Makumbi, Dan
    FOOD CONTROL, 2019, 96 : 219 - 226
  • [5] Aflatoxin-producing fungi associated with pre-harvest maize contamination in Uganda
    Sserumaga, Julius P.
    Ortega-Beltran, Alejandro
    Wagacha, John M.
    Mutegi, Charity K.
    Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 313
  • [6] Assessing Genotype-By-Environment Interactions in Aspergillus Ear Rot and Pre-Harvest Aflatoxin Accumulation in Maize Inbred Lines
    Okoth, Sheila
    Rose, Lindy J.
    Ouko, Abigael
    Netshifhefhe, Nakisani E. I.
    Sila, Henry
    Viljoen, Altus
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2017, 7 (04):
  • [7] Delivery systems for biological control agents to manage aflatoxin contamination of pre-harvest maize
    Lyn, M. E.
    Abbas, H. K.
    Zablotowicz, R. M.
    Johnson, B. J.
    FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT, 2009, 26 (03): : 381 - 387
  • [8] Resistance to pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination in ICRISAT’s groundnut mini core collection
    F. Waliyar
    K. Vijay Krishna Kumar
    M. Diallo
    A. Traore
    U. N. Mangala
    H. D. Upadhyaya
    H. Sudini
    European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2016, 145 : 901 - 913
  • [9] Resistance to pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination in ICRISAT's groundnut mini core collection
    Waliyar, F.
    Kumar, K. Vijay Krishna
    Diallo, M.
    Traore, A.
    Mangala, U. N.
    Upadhyaya, H. D.
    Sudini, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2016, 145 (04) : 901 - 913
  • [10] Management practices to minimise pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination in Australian peanuts
    Rachaputi, N
    Wright, GC
    Krosch, S
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2002, 42 (05) : 595 - 605