Measuring engagement in advance care planning: a cross-sectional multicentre feasibility study

被引:25
|
作者
Howard, Michelle [1 ]
Bonham, Aaron J. [2 ]
Heyland, Daren K. [3 ,4 ]
Sudore, Rebecca [5 ,6 ]
Fassbender, Konrad [7 ]
Robinson, Carole A. [8 ]
McKenzie, Michael [9 ]
Elston, Dawn [1 ]
You, John J. [2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Family Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Kingston Gen Hosp, Clin Evaluat Res Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Covenant Hlth Palliat Inst, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[9] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver Canc Ctr, Radiat Therapy Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[10] McMaster Univ, Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
advance care planning; communication; survey; measurement; OF-LIFE CARE; DECISION-MAKING; FAMILY SATISFACTION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; MEASURE PATIENT; END; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010375
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the feasibility, acceptability and clinical sensibility of a novel survey, the advance care planning (ACP) Engagement Survey, in various healthcare settings. Setting A target sample of 50 patients from each of primary care, hospital, cancer care and dialysis care settings. Participants A convenience sample of patients without cognitive impairment who could speak and read English was recruited. Patients 50 and older were eligible in primary care; patients 80 and older or 55 and older with clinical markers of advanced chronic disease were recruited in hospital; patients aged 19 and older were recruited in cancer and renal dialysis centres. Outcomes We assessed feasibility, acceptability and clinical sensibility of the ACP Engagement Survey using a 6-point scale. The ACP Engagement Survey measures ACP processes (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness) on 5-point Likert scales and actions (yes/no). Results 196 patients (38-96years old, 50.5% women) participated. Mean (SD) time to administer was 48.8 +/- 19.6min. Mean acceptability scores ranged from 3.2 +/- 1.3 in hospital to 4.7 +/- 0.9 in primary care, and mean relevance ranged from 3.5 +/- 1.0 in hospital to 4.9 +/- 0.9 in dialysis centres (p<0.001 for both). The mean process score was 3.1 +/- 0.6 and the mean action score was 11.2 +/- 5.6 (of a possible 25). Conclusions The ACP Engagement Survey demonstrated feasibility and acceptability in outpatient settings but was less feasible and acceptable among hospitalised patients due to length. A shorter version may improve feasibility. Engagement in ACP was low to moderate.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nurses' engagement in advance care planning practices: A descriptive cross-sectional study
    Lee, Sangmin
    Cui, Naixue
    Kim, Hyejin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [2] Patient experience of primary care and advance care planning: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
    Aoki, Takuya
    Miyashita, Jun
    Yamamoto, Yosuke
    Ikenoue, Tatsuyoshi
    Kise, Morito
    Fujinuma, Yasuki
    Fukuma, Shingo
    Kimachi, Miho
    Shimizu, Sayaka
    Fukuhara, Shunichi
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (02) : 206 - 212
  • [3] Measuring Advance Care Planning: Optimizing the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey
    Sudore, Rebecca
    Heyland, Daren
    Barnes, Deborah
    Howard, Michelle
    Fassbender, Konrad
    Robinson, Carole
    Boscardin, John
    You, John
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 53 (02) : 318 - 318
  • [4] Measuring Advance Care Planning: Optimizing the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey
    Sudore, R.
    Heyland, D.
    Barnes, D.
    Howard, M.
    Fassbender, K.
    Robinson, C.
    Boscardin, J.
    You, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2017, 65 : S117 - S117
  • [5] Measuring Advance Care Planning: Optimizing the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey
    Sudore, Rebecca L.
    Heyland, Daren K.
    Barnes, Deborah E.
    Howard, Michelle
    Fassbender, Konrad
    Robinson, Carole A.
    Boscardin, John
    You, John J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 53 (04) : 669 - +
  • [6] Advance Care Planning Preferences in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Community
    Yu, Andrew
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [7] Gender and couple status differences in advance care planning: a cross-sectional study
    Baughman, Kristin R.
    Ludwick, Ruth
    Audi, Ashley
    Harlan, Laura
    PALLIATIVE CARE & SOCIAL PRACTICE, 2024, 18
  • [8] Web-based questionnaire survey for exploring engagement characteristics of advance care planning in Japan: a cross-sectional study
    Nakanishi, Yasuhiro
    Tsugihashi, Yukio
    Hayasaka, Akira
    Nishioka, Yuichi
    Akahane, Manabu
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [9] Factors Associated with Advance Care Planning Engagement Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Dao-Tran, Tiet-Hanh
    Yeoh, Ling
    Comans, Tracy
    Karusoo-Musumeci, Ava
    Auret, Kirsten A.
    Sinclair, Ron
    Hilgeman, Michelle M.
    Clayton, Josephine M.
    Halcomb, Elizabeth
    Campbell, Elissa
    Meller, Anne
    Walton, Rebecca
    Kurrle, Susan
    Sinclair, Craig
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [10] Web-based questionnaire survey for exploring engagement characteristics of advance care planning in Japan: a cross-sectional study
    Yasuhiro Nakanishi
    Yukio Tsugihashi
    Akira Hayasaka
    Yuichi Nishioka
    Manabu Akahane
    BMC Research Notes, 17