Pollution Remediation by Urban Forests: PM2.5 Reduction in Beijing, China

被引:13
|
作者
Chen, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Shaowei [2 ]
Zhao, Yunge [3 ]
Li, Shaoning [2 ]
Yang, Xinbing [3 ]
Wang, Bing [4 ]
Zhang, Hongjiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Soil & Water Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Ecoenvironm Improvement Fo, Forestry & Pomol Inst, Beijing 100093, Peoples R China
[3] Agr Univ Hebei, Coll Forestry, Baoding 071000, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Forestry, Inst Forest Ecol & Environm Protect, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
urban forest; remove function; PM2.5; aerosol generator; Beijing nitrification and denitrification; functional bacteria; DUST-RETAINING CAPABILITY; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; DEPOSITION VELOCITY; LEAF SURFACE; AEROSOL; PARTICLES; GUANGZHOU; SULFATE; LEAVES; TREES;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/63208
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We based our research on real-time monitoring data for PM2.5 at the Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Monitoring Center of Haidian Beijing Botanical Garden (a vegetated area), and at Haidian Wanliu (a non-vegetated area). By combining these two data points with the PM2.5 and meteorological data from a separate monitoring station in Beijing Botanical Garden's forest interior, we analyzed the daily fluctuation, regional variation, and foliar adsorption characteristics of PM2.5 in varied environments (Feb.-Dec. 2013 and Jan.-Feb. 2014). Our results show a double peak and valley pattern of PM2.5 daily variation and daytime values greater than nighttime measurements. Average annual PM2.5 concentration values at different monitoring stations were Haidian Wanliu (100.61 +/- 26.49 mu g.m(-3)), greater than at the Beijing Botanical Garden forest interior monitoring station (89.72 +/- 23.49 mu g.m(-3)), and both greater than at Haidian Beijing Botanical Garden (77.72 +/- 23.37 mu g.m(-3)). The maximum PM2.5 concentrations during 12 months were all in Haidian Wanliu (non-vegetated area), while the minimums were all in Haidian Beijing Botanical Garden (vegetated), Haidian Wanliu being 83.33% of the time higher in PM2.5 concentration than Beijing Botanical Garden forest interior. Possibly because of the trees, PM2.5 concentrations in the forest area were lower than that in the non-vegetated area. We find an average PM2.5 adsorption capacity per unit leaf area of 0.048 +/- 0.031 mu g.cm(-2) 0.645 +/- 0.034 mu g.cm(-2) in May, and 0.058 +/- 0.006 mu g.cm(-2) -0.887 +/- 0.014 mu g.cm(-2) in June for the 10 tree species included in our study. Of these 10, incense Cedrus deodara evidences the greatest adsorption and Sophora japonica shows the minimum. As a whole, conifers adsorb at 1.32 times the rate of broadleaf tree species, according to our data. PM2.5 adsorption capacity was greater in June (0.294 +/- 0.227 mu g.cm(-2)) than in May (0.215 +/- 0.184 mu g.cm(-2)). Daily and annual variation in different regions falls into a pattern where Haidian Wanliu pollution is greater than Beijing Botanical Garden forest interior monitoring station, and both are greater than Haidian Beijing Botanical Garden, which confirms the forest ecosystem's involvement. It appears that the forest has many functions, including atmospheric purification by adsorption of PM2.5 and other particulates as evidenced by better air quality in forest areas than in non-vegetated sites. Furthermore, forest clearings show better air quality than the forest interior.
引用
收藏
页码:1873 / 1881
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deposition of PM2.5 Sulfate in the Spring on Urban Forests in Beijing, China
    Zhao, Lu
    Lun, Xiaoxiu
    Li, Renna
    Cao, Yingying
    Sun, Fengbin
    Yu, Xinxiao
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2017, 8 (01):
  • [2] The characteristics of PM2.5 in Beijing, China
    He, KB
    Yang, FM
    Ma, YL
    Zhang, Q
    Yao, XH
    Chan, CK
    Cadle, S
    Chan, T
    Mulawa, P
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (29) : 4959 - 4970
  • [3] The contribution of socioeconomic factors to PM2.5 pollution in urban China
    Jiang, Peng
    Yang, Jun
    Huang, Conghong
    Liu, Huakui
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2018, 233 : 977 - 985
  • [4] Are House Prices Affected by PM2.5 Pollution? Evidence from Beijing, China
    Xue, Wenhao
    Li, Xinyao
    Yang, Zhe
    Wei, Jing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (14)
  • [5] Source apportionment of PM2.5 pollution in the central six districts of Beijing, China
    Zhang, Yuepeng
    Li, Xuan
    Nie, Teng
    Qi, Jun
    Chen, Jing
    Wu, Qiong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 661 - 669
  • [6] Effects of Urban Expansion and Changes in Urban Characteristics on PM2.5 Pollution in China
    Wang, Gui-Lin
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2019, 40 (08): : 3447 - 3456
  • [7] Forestry strategies against PM2.5 pollution in Beijing
    Chen, Bo
    Wang, Xiaoping
    Chen, Junqi
    Zhu, Jiangang
    Liu, Jinglan
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2015, 91 (03): : 233 - 237
  • [8] Variation of Urban Atmospheric Ammonia Pollution and its Relation with PM2.5 Chemical Property in Winter of Beijing, China
    Zhao, Minjiang
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Tan, Jihua
    Hua, Yang
    Wu, Di
    Hao, Jiming
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (06) : 1378 - 1389
  • [9] The impact of foreign direct investment on urban PM2.5 pollution in China
    Cheng, Zhonghua
    Li, Lianshui
    Liu, Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 265
  • [10] Analysis of Pollution Characteristics of PM2.5 and PM10 in Beijing
    Cui, Rong
    Guo, Xinbiao
    Deng, Furong
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) : S220 - S221