Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 3: aspects of indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics

被引:8
|
作者
Jum'ah, A. A. [1 ]
Creanor, S. [2 ,3 ]
Wilson, N. H. F. [4 ]
Burke, F. J. T. [5 ]
Brunton, P. A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Irbid, Jordan
[2] Plymouth Univ, Peninsula Sch Med, Med Stat, Plymouth, Devon, England
[3] Plymouth Univ, Peninsula Sch Dent, Med Stat, Plymouth, Devon, England
[4] Kings Coll London Dent Inst, London, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Sch Dent, Primary Dent Care Res Grp, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Univ Otago, Sir John Walsh Res Inst, Fac Dent, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
ARRANGEMENTS; CROWNS; TEETH; POSTS;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.95
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective This paper reports data which helps identify changes and trends in the provision of indirect fixed prostheses in general dental practice in the UK. To determine by means of an anonymous, self-report questionnaire, the current trend in the provision of fixed prosthodontic treatments, with a special emphasis on the choice of treatment modalities, techniques and materials. Methods The data presented were extracted from the data obtained from a validated, 121-question questionnaire distributed at random to general dental practitioners in the UK attending postgraduate meetings in 2015/2016, with a wide distribution of locations. Results A response rate exceeding 66% was achieved. Amalgam and light-cured composite were the preferred material for core build-up of vital teeth for around 62% of the respondents. Dentine pins were still being used by 66% of the respondents. The vast majority of respondents (92%) used a post and core to restore root-treated teeth. Fibre posts were the most commonly used (63%) type of preformed post among the respondents. Using the opposing and adjacent teeth as a reference to control tooth structure reduction during vital tooth preparation was the most common method, used by 42% of the respondents. Addition-cured silicone impression materials were the most frequently used impression material (78%). The surveyed practitioners were equally split between precious and non-precious metals as the substructure for indirect restorations. Glass-ionomer luting cements (47%) and resin-based cements (52%) were the most commonly used to cement porcelain fused to metal and zirconia indirect restorations, respectively. Laboratory made aesthetic veneers were prescribed by half of the respondents, while a third of them preferred direct resin composite as a veneer material. Conclusion Within the limitations of the study, it was concluded that there has been an increase in the use of adhesive bonding and metal-free restorations. Amalgam and dentine pins continued to be used, contrary to international trends. Studies of the type reported are considered important in investigating trends and developments in dentistry.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 196
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 3: aspects of indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics
    A. A. Jum'ah
    S. Creanor
    N. H. F. Wilson
    F. J. T. Burke
    P. A. Brunton
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2019, 226 : 192 - 196
  • [2] Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics
    Brunton, PA
    Christensen, GJ
    Cheung, SW
    Burke, FJT
    Wilson, NHF
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2005, 198 (02) : 99 - 103
  • [3] Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics
    P A Brunton
    G J Christensen
    S W Cheung
    F J T Burke
    N H F Wilson
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2005, 198 : 99 - 103
  • [4] Contemporary dental practice in the UK in 2008: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics
    Brunton, P. A.
    Sharif, M. O.
    Creanor, S.
    Burke, F. J. T.
    Wilson, N. H. F.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2012, 212 (03) : 115 - 119
  • [5] Contemporary dental practice in the UK in 2008: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics
    P. A. Brunton
    M. O. Sharif
    S. Creanor
    F. J. T. Burke
    N. H. F. Wilson
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2012, 212 : 115 - 119
  • [6] Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 2: aspects of direct restorations, bleaching, endodontics and paediatric dentistry
    Wilson, N. H. F.
    Burke, F. J. T.
    Brunton, P. A.
    Creanor, S.
    Nosey, M. T.
    Mannocci, F.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 226 (02) : 110 - 114
  • [7] Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 2: aspects of direct restorations, bleaching, endodontics and paediatric dentistry
    N. H. F. Wilson
    F. J. T. Burke
    P. A. Brunton
    S. Creanor
    M. T. Hosey
    F. Mannocci
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2019, 226 : 110 - 114
  • [8] Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 4: changes since 2002?
    Burke, F. J. Trevor
    Wilson, Nairn H. F.
    Brunton, Paul A.
    Creanor, Siobhan
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 226 (04) : 279 - 285
  • [9] Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 4: changes since 2002?
    F. J. Trevor Burke
    Nairn H. F. Wilson
    Paul A. Brunton
    Siobhan Creanor
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2019, 226 : 279 - 285
  • [10] Contemporary dental practice in the UK: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching
    Wilson, NHF
    Christensen, GJ
    Cheung, SW
    Burke, FJT
    Brunton, PA
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2004, 197 (12) : 753 - 756