MINIMUM AGE FOR LIVING DONORS: REVIEW OF LIVING ORGAN DONATION POLICY IN HONG KONG

被引:0
|
作者
Kwok, Wing-sze
Lee, Albert [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Hlth Educ & Hlth Promot, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICINE AND LAW | 2022年 / 41卷 / 1-2期
关键词
Organ Donation; Minor Consent; Age Limit; Rights of Minor; Organ Donation Policy; Law Reform; MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING; BRAIN-DEVELOPMENT; MATURE MINOR; ADOLESCENT; REFLECTIONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: A recent Hong Kong incident of an under-18 year adolescent being prohibited from donating part of her liver to save her mother has aroused public controversy on the minimum legal age for living organ donors. This review was carried out with the aim to review the criteria and rationale of setting the legal age limit for living organ donation, their compatibility within the Hong Kong local context, and to examine the appropriateness of setting age 18 as the minimum legal age for living donors in Hong Kong. Methods: A policy literature review was conducted, which included a comprehensive search of five electronic databases for literature on living organ donation using specific searching keywords. Literature selection was conducted by screening the titles and abstracts of all identified literature and assessing their relevance. Full text publications of all potentially relevant articles were retrieved and assessed against the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant information and data were extracted, summarized, and interpreted. Results: From the identified literature, the 2 main rationales behind setting up a minimum age for living donors were capacity and voluntariness. Literature from the perspectives of developmental science and cultural studies was reviewed to study their impact relevant to age. There was inconclusive evidence suggesting cognitive maturity and voluntariness for age below 18 years. Attitudes amongstakeholders were not favorable regarding lowering the current minimum age of 18. Conclusions: There was no scientific evidence or society need to lower the minimum living donor age in the current Hong Kong situation. To solve the issue regarding lack of suitable organ supply, alternatives should be explored whilst maintaining the current minimum living donor age.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 274
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The ethics of organ donation by living donors
    Truog, RD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (05): : 444 - 446
  • [2] AGE AS A CRITERION IN LIVING ORGAN DONATION
    Waehlke, Sabine
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 414 - 414
  • [3] Living organ donation needs debate on harm to donors
    Evans, David W.
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7574): : 919 - 919
  • [4] LIVING-RELATED ORGAN DONATION - THE DONORS DILEMMA
    RUSSELL, S
    JACOB, RG
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1993, 21 (1-2) : 89 - 99
  • [5] PRINCIPLES OF ORGAN AND TISSUE ALLOCATION AND DONATION BY LIVING DONORS
    BURDICK, JF
    TURCOTTE, JG
    VEATCH, RM
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1992, 24 (05) : 2226 - 2226
  • [6] FOSTERING LIVING ORGAN DONATION: NEEDS AND SUGGESTIONS REPORTED BY LIVING KIDNEY DONORS
    Schieber, K.
    Gaag, S.
    Heller, K.
    Eckardt, K. -U.
    Erim, Y.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 21 - 21
  • [7] Is solid organ donation by living donors ethical? The case of kidney donation
    Potts, Michael
    Evans, David W.
    [J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION: ETHICAL, LEGAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS - TOWARDS A COMMON EUROPEAN POLICY, 2008, : 377 - +
  • [9] Gendering Organ Donation: Experiences of Living Women Organ Donors in India
    Mishra, Nishtha
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (09) : S683 - S683
  • [10] Characteristics and clinical outcomes of living renal donors in Hong Kong
    Hong, Y. L.
    Yee, C. H.
    Leung, C. B.
    Teoh, Jeremy Y. C.
    Kwan, Bonnie C. H.
    Li, Philip K. T.
    Hou, Simon S. M.
    Ng, C. F.
    [J]. HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (01) : 11 - 17