A global systematic review of ecological field studies on two major invasive plant species, Ageratina adenophora and Chromolaena odorata

被引:23
|
作者
Yu, Fuke [1 ,2 ]
Akin-Fajiye, Morodoluwa [2 ]
Magar, Khum Thapa [2 ]
Ren, Jie [2 ]
Gurevitch, Jessica [2 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Univ, Sch Ecol & Environm Sci, Kunming 650091, Peoples R China
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
biological invasions; China; invasion hypotheses; subtropical ecology; systematic review; West Africa; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; ALIEN PLANTS; BIOTIC RESISTANCE; WEED; PATTERNS; CONSERVATION; PATHOGENS; IMPACTS; AFRICA; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12481
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Much of what is known about invasion biology is based on research conducted in North America and Europe, leading to limitations and potential biases in our knowledge. We address these limitations by conducting a systematic review to assess the literature on ecological studies of two major tropical and subtropical invasive plant species, Ageratina adenophora and Chromolaena odorata. Our goals were to: (1) collect the literature on the invasion biology of these species by broadly searching five databases (one international and four regional); (2) determine limitations to the international literature available in the ISI Web of Science (WOS); (3) quantitatively summarize the scope of the invasion literature on the two species; and (4) propose future studies based on what we found. Location Global. Methods Using specific search terms, we searched the literature for A. adenophora and C. odorata in the ISI WOS, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Indian Journals, Nepal Journals Online and African Journals Online (AJOL). We extracted information on journal titles, publication years, study area locations, habitats investigated and study focus. Results We found 101 papers for A. adenophora and 61 papers for C. odorata, published from 1987 to 2015. A high percentage of the studies were conducted in China, western and southern Africa, and India. Studies from WOS most frequently focused on the mechanism of invasion, while studies from CNKI and AJOL focused on the impacts of the invader. Main conclusions Web of Science is not sufficient for generalizing about the invasion biology literature, particularly if the goal is a comprehensive assessment that includes areas other than North America, Hawaii, Europe, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand. In future systematic reviews, other databases should be used if possible, including those in languages other than English. For future research, several research areas should be studied more thoroughly for A. adenophora and C. odorata invasions, including possible multiple factors responsible for invasion, and impacts of co-occurring invasive species.
引用
收藏
页码:1174 / 1185
页数:12
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Controlling invasive plant species in ecological restoration: A global review
    Weidlich, Emanuela W. A.
    Florido, Flavia G.
    Sorrini, Taisi B.
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (09) : 1806 - 1817
  • [2] Ecological niche modeling of invasive plant species according to invasion status and management needs: the case of Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae) in South Africa
    Ernesto Suarez-Mota, Mario
    Ortiz, Enrique
    Luis Villasenor, Jose
    Espinosa-Garcia, Francisco J.
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2016, 64 (03) : 369 - 383