Place-provider-matrix of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide observational cross-sectional analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Kim, Dae Kon [1 ]
Shin, Sang Do [2 ]
Ro, Young Sun [3 ]
Song, Kyoung Jun [4 ,5 ]
Hong, Ki Jeong [4 ]
Kong, So Yeon Joyce [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Lab Emergency Med Serv, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Boramae Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Lab Emergency Med Serv, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 05期
关键词
SURVIVAL; PROGRAM; EDUCATION; LOCATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0232999
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Aims This study aims to test the association between the place-provider-matrix (PPM) of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods Adult patients with OHCA with a cardiac etiology from 2012 to 2017 in Korea were analyzed, excluding patients who had unknown information on place, type of bystander, or outcome. The PPM was categorized into six groups by two types of places (public versus home) and three types of providers (trained responder (TR), family bystander, and layperson bystander). Outcomes were survival to discharge and good cerebral performance category (CPC) of 1 or 2. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between PPM group and outcomes with adjustment for potential confounders to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (reference = Public-TR). Results A total of 73,057 patients were analyzed and were categorized into Public-TR (0.6%), Home-TR (0.3%), Public-Family (1.8%), Home-Family (79.8%), Public-Layperson (9.9%), and Home-Layperson (7.6%) groups. Compared with the Public-TR group, the AORs (95% CIs) for survival to discharge were 0.61 (0.35-1.05) in the Home-TR group, 0.85 (0.62-1.17) in the Public-Family group, 0.38 (0.29-0.50) in the Home-Family group, 1.12 (0.85-1.49) in the Public-Layperson group, and 0.42 (0.31-0.57) in the Home-Layperson group. The AORs (95% CIs) for good CPC were 0.58 (0.27-1.25) in the Home-TR group, 0.88 (0.61-1.27) in the Public-Family group, 0.38 (0.28-0.52) in the Home-Family group, 1.20 (0.87-1.65) in the Public-Layperson group, and 0.42 (0.30-0.59) in the Home-Layperson group. Conclusion The OHCA outcomes of the Home-Family and Home-Layperson groups were worse than those of the Public-TR group. This finding suggests that OHCA occurring in private places with family or layperson bystanders requires a new strategy, such as dispatching trained responders to the scene to improve CPR outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST OUTCOMES - BYSTANDER CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION RATE IMPROVEMENT
    Vazanic, Damir
    Prkacin, Ingrid
    Nesek-Adam, Visnja
    Kurtovic, Biljana
    Rotim, Cecilija
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2022, 61 (02) : 265 - 272
  • [2] No Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation For Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest In Vietnam: Impact On The Outcomes
    Do, Son N.
    Luong, Chinh Q.
    Manabe, Toshie
    Nguyen, My H.
    Pham, Dung T.
    Ton, Tra T.
    Hoang, Quoc T.
    Nguyen, Dat T.
    Pham, Thao T.
    Hoang, Hanh T.
    Khuong, Dai Q.
    Nguyen, Quan H.
    Nguyen, Tuan A.
    Dang, Hien D.
    Hoang, Hai B.
    Nguyen, Chi V.
    Nguyen, Anh D.
    McNally, Bryan F.
    Ong, Marcus E.
    Dao, Co X.
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [3] Comorbidity and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Hirlekar, Geir
    Jonsson, Martin
    Karlsson, Thomas
    Back, Maria
    Rawshani, Araz
    Hollenberg, Jacob
    Albertsson, Per
    Herlitz, Johan
    HEART, 2020, 106 (14) : 1087 - 1093
  • [4] Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to location of arrest
    Sondergaard, K. B.
    Rajan, S.
    Wissenberg, M.
    Karlsson, L.
    Kragholm, K. H.
    Pape, M.
    Lippert, F. K.
    Gislason, G. H.
    Folke, F.
    Torp-Pedersen, C.
    Hansen, S. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 600 - 600
  • [5] Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Cases in Chicago
    Khosla, Shaveta
    Del Rios, Marina
    Kotini-Shah, Pavitra
    Schwerin, Courtney
    Froelich, Elizabeth
    Fokum, Brenice
    Campbell, Teri
    Markul, Eddie
    Tataris, Katie
    Weber, Joseph
    Vanden, Terry
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [6] BYSTANDER CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION (CPR) IN OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST
    BOSSAERT, L
    VANHOEYWEGHEN, R
    RESUSCITATION, 1989, 17 : S55 - S69
  • [7] Different forms of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Riva, G.
    Hollenberg, J.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 290 (01) : 57 - 72
  • [8] Current trends and outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan: A nationwide observational study
    Nakajima, Mikio
    Kaszynski, Richard H.
    Goto, Hideaki
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Yamaguchi, Yoshihiro
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2020, 4
  • [9] Time to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation by patient sex for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Gupta, Kashvi
    Nguyen, Dan D.
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Chan, Paul S.
    RESUSCITATION, 2024, 196
  • [10] Impact of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcome in Vietnam
    Dao, Co Xuan
    Luong, Chinh Quoc
    Manabe, Toshie
    Nguyen, My Ha
    Pham, Dung Thi
    Thanh Ton, Tra Thanh
    Hoang, Quoc Trong Ai
    Nguyen, Tuan Anh
    Nguyen, Anh Dat
    McNally, Bryan Francis
    Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
    Do, Son Ngoc
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (04)