Males Resemble Females: Re-Evaluating Sexual Dimorphism in Protoceratops andrewsi (Neoceratopsia, Protoceratopsidae)

被引:18
|
作者
Maiorino, Leonardo [1 ,2 ]
Farke, Andrew A. [3 ]
Kotsakis, Tassos [1 ,2 ]
Piras, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tre, Dipartimento Sci, Rome, Italy
[2] Ctr Evolutionary Ecol, Rome, Italy
[3] Raymond M Alf Museum Paleontol, Claremont, CA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
DINOSAUR PARK FORMATION; GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS; SIZE DIMORPHISM; EVOLUTION; ORNITHISCHIA; MORPHOLOGY; SKULL; CERATOPSIDAE; SELECTION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0126464
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Protoceratops andrewsi(Neoceratopsia, Protoceratopsidae) is a well-known dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. Some previous workers hypothesized sexual dimorphism in the cranial shape of this taxon, using qualitative and quantitative observations. In particular, width and height of the frill as well as the development of a nasal horn have been hypothesized as potentially sexually dimorphic. Methodology/Principal Findings Here, we reassess potential sexual dimorphism in skulls of Protoceratops andrewsiby applying two-dimensional geometric morphometrics to 29 skulls in lateral and dorsal views. Principal Component Analyses and nonparametric MANOVAs recover no clear separation between hypothetical "males" and "females" within the overall morphospace. Males and females thus possess similar overall cranial morphologies. No differences in size between "males" and "females" are recovered using nonparametric ANOVAs. Conclusions/Significance Sexual dimorphism within Protoceratops andrewsiis not strongly supported by our results, as previously proposed by several authors. Anatomical traits such as height and width of the frill, and skull size thus may not be sexually dimorphic. Based on PCA for a data set focusing on the rostrum and associated ANOVA results, nasal horn height is the only feature with potential dimorphism. As a whole, most purported dimorphic variation is probably primarily the result of ontogenetic cranial shape changes as well as intraspecific cranial variation independent of sex.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Sexual dimorphism in the postcranial skeleton of protoceratopsids (Neoceratopsia, Protoceratopsidae) from Mongolia
    Tereshchenko, VS
    [J]. PALEONTOLOGICHESKII ZHURNAL, 2001, (04): : 79 - 89
  • [2] REVERSED SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN MICROTINES - ARE FEMALES LARGER THAN MALES OR ARE MALES SMALLER THAN FEMALES
    BONDRUPNIELSEN, S
    IMS, RA
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1990, 4 (03) : 261 - 272
  • [3] Re-evaluating the relationship between pathogen avoidance and preferences for facial symmetry and sexual dimorphism: A registered report
    Tybur, Joshua M.
    Fan, Lei
    Jones, Benedict C.
    Holzleitner, Iris J.
    Lee, Anthony J.
    DeBruine, Lisa M.
    [J]. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2022, 43 (03) : 212 - 223
  • [4] Re-evaluating the behavioral implications of sexual dimorphism in hominins using paternity and group size data in primates
    Plavcan, J. Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2023, 180 : 140 - 140
  • [5] Why do males emerge before females? Sexual size dimorphism drives sexual bimaturism in insects
    Teder, Tiit
    Kaasik, Ants
    Taits, Kristiina
    Tammaru, Toomas
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2021, 96 (06) : 2461 - 2475
  • [6] Oval in Males and Triangular in Females? A Quantitative Evaluation of Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Obturator Foramen
    Bierry, Guillaume
    Le Minor, Jean-Marie
    Schmittbuhl, Mathieu
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2010, 141 (04) : 626 - 631
  • [7] Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females
    Fairbairn, DJ
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1997, 28 : 659 - 687
  • [8] Sexual dimorphism in Coronis scolopendra (Stomatopoda): do males and females see the world differently?
    Vaccaro-Garska, K. M.
    Kocot, K. M.
    Janosik, A. M.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 58 : E438 - E438
  • [9] The Ontogeny of Sexual Size Dimorphism of a Moth: When Do Males and Females Grow Apart?
    Stillwell, R. Craig
    Daws, Andrew
    Davidowitz, Goggy
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [10] Substantial but Misunderstood Human Sexual Dimorphism Results Mainly From Sexual Selection on Males and Natural Selection on Females
    Lassek, William D.
    Gaulin, Steven J. C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13