What do midwives think about interprofessional working and learning?

被引:7
|
作者
Murray-Davis, Beth [1 ]
Marshall, Michelle [2 ]
Gordon, Frances [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Midwifery Educ Program, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield S1 1WB, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Interprofessional working and learning; Collaborative maternity care; Midwives' perspectives;
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.011
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: this study describes the views of midwives and educators regarding interprofessional working and learning within midwifery care. Design: qualitative methods using semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Participants: 39 participants, drawn from three participant groups - midwifery educators, newly qualified midwives and Heads of Midwifery - from four university sites throughout the UK took part in the research. Findings: midwives are called upon to work collaboratively with other professionals during the daily provision of maternity care. Midwives are aware of the competencies required for effective collaboration and are supportive of the inclusion of interprofessional education in the training of student midwives. However, the relevance of this education was questioned by some participants because it is not apparent whether its inclusion will result in midwives who are better able to collaborate. Key conclusions: midwives are supportive of interprofessional learning for students but are uncertain whether it will result in changes in practice. Implications for practice: interprofessional education may support collaboration in practice, but future educational research aimed at understanding how learning is applied to practice is needed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 381
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What do we think about them and what do they think about us? Social representations of interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in the welfare sector
    Widmark, Catharina
    Sandahl, Christer
    Piuva, Katarina
    Bergman, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2016, 30 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [2] Learning: What Do Primary Pupils Think About It?
    Taskin, Cigdem Sahin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 105 (04): : 277 - 285
  • [3] What do conservation biologists think about their job and working conditions?
    Ramos, Hazel Melanie
    Mustafa, Michael
    Primack, Richard
    Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 211 : 183 - 188
  • [4] Appraisal of general practitioners working in occupational medicine: what happens, and what do they think about it?
    Thorley, Kevan
    [J]. EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY CARE, 2008, 19 (04) : 376 - 381
  • [5] What Do Chimeras Think About?
    Capps, Benjamin
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2023, 32 (04) : 496 - 514
  • [6] What do teachers of STEM disciplines think about learning by inquiry?
    Tiestos, Carmen Julve
    [J]. REIDOCREA-REVISTA EECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y DOCENCIA CREATIVA, 2022, 11 : 670 - 674
  • [7] Artificial intelligence and the future of midwifery: What do midwives think about artificial intelligence? A qualitative study
    Citil, Elif Tugce
    Canbay, Funda Citil
    [J]. HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 43 (12) : 1510 - 1527
  • [8] Working Systemically in a Learning Disability Service: What do Colleagues and Carers Think?
    Smyly, Selma Rikberg
    Elsworth, Julie
    Mann, Judith
    Coates, Emma
    [J]. TIZARD LEARNING DISABILITY REVIEW, 2008, 13 (02) : 15 - +
  • [9] What do midwives think about genetics? The implications for genetics education of midwives' views on the importance of genetics and their rating of their own competence.
    Bennett, C
    Haydon, J
    Metcalfe, A
    Farndon, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2004, 41 : S86 - S86
  • [10] Do students think what teachers think about plagiarism?
    Foltynek, Tomas
    Rybicka, Jiri
    Demoliou, Catherine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRITY, 2014, 10 (01): : 21 - 30