Thermal traits predict the winners and losers under climate change: an example from North American ant communities

被引:28
|
作者
Roeder, Karl A. [1 ,2 ]
Bujan, Jelena [2 ,3 ]
Beurs, Kirsten M. [4 ]
Weiser, Michael D. [2 ]
Kaspari, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA, Agr Res Serv, North Cent Agr Res Lab, Brookings, SD 57006 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Biol, Geog Ecol Grp, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Univ Lausanne, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Geog & Environm Sustainabil, Norman, OK 73019 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2021年 / 12卷 / 07期
关键词
ants; climate change; incidence; insects; macrophysiology; temperature; thermal performance; thermal tolerance; traits; ALTERNATIVE STABLE STATES; GLOBAL ANALYSIS; LIMITS; TOLERANCE; RESPONSES; TERRESTRIAL; TEMPERATURE; DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.3645
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Across the globe, temperatures are predicted to increase with consequences for many taxonomic groups. Arthropods are particularly at risk as temperature imposes physiological constraints on growth, survival, and reproduction. Given that arthropods may be disproportionately affected in a warmer climate-the question becomes which taxa are vulnerable and can we predict the supposed winners and losers of climate change? To address this question, we resurveyed 33 ant communities, quantifying 20-yr differences in the incidence of 28 genera. Each North American ant community was surveyed with 30 1.m(2) plots, and the incidence of each genus across the 30 plots was used to estimate change. From the original surveys in 1994-1997 to the resurveys in 2016-2017, temperature increased on average 1 degrees C (range, -0.4 degrees C to 2.5 degrees C) and similar to 64% of ant genera increased in more than half of the sampled communities. To test Thermal Performance Theory's prediction that genera with higher average thermal limits will tend to accumulate at the expense of those with lower limits, we quantified critical thermal maxima (CTmax: the high temperatures at which they lose muscle control) and minima (CTmin: the low temperatures at which ants first become inactive) for common genera at each site. Consistent with prediction, we found a positive decelerating relationship between CTmax and the proportion of sites in which a genus had increased. CTmin, by contrast, was not a useful predictor of change. There was a strong positive correlation (r = 0.85) between the proportion of sites where a genus was found with higher incidence after 20 yr and the average difference in number of plots occupied per site, suggesting genera with high CTmax values tended to occupy more plots at more sites after 20 yr. Thermal functional traits like CTmax have thus proved useful in predicting patterns of long-term community change in a dominant, diverse insect taxon.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Climate change winners and losers among North American bumblebees
    Jackson, Hanna M.
    Johnson, Sarah A.
    Morandin, Lora A.
    Richardson, Leif L.
    Guzman, Laura Melissa
    M'Gonigle, Leithen K.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 18 (06) : 20210551
  • [2] Predicting invasion winners and losers under climate change
    Buckley, Yvonne M.
    Csergo, Anna M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (16) : 4040 - 4041
  • [3] Winners and losers in US marine aquaculture under climate change
    Fong, C. R.
    DeCesaro, J.
    Clawson, G.
    Frazier, M.
    Halpern, B. S.
    Froehlich, H. E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (11):
  • [4] Winners and Losers: Cordulegaster Species under the Pressure of Climate Change
    Fekete, Judit
    De Knijf, Geert
    Dinis, Marco
    Padisak, Judit
    Boda, Pal
    Mizsei, Edvard
    Varbiro, Gabor
    INSECTS, 2023, 14 (04)
  • [5] Species interactions and climate change: does thermal tolerance determine winners and losers?
    Shah, A. A.
    Hamant, E. L.
    Woods, H. A.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 61 : E814 - E814
  • [6] Marine capture fisheries in the Arctic: winners or losers under climate change and ocean acidification?
    Lam, Vicky W. Y.
    Cheung, William W. L.
    Sumaila, U. Rashid
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2016, 17 (02) : 335 - 357
  • [7] Interesting times: winners, losers, and system shifts under climate change around Australia
    Fulton, E. A.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2011, 68 (06) : 1329 - 1342
  • [8] Winners and losers in a changing climate: how will protected areas conserve red list species under climate change?
    Hoveka, Lerato N.
    Bank, Michelle
    Davies, T. Jonathan
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2022, 28 (04) : 782 - 792
  • [9] Winners and losers from climate change in agriculture: Insights from a case study in the Mediterranean basin
    Dono, Gabriele
    Cortignani, Raffaele
    Dell'Unto, Davide
    Deligios, Paola
    Doro, Luca
    Lacetera, Nicola
    Mula, Laura
    Pasqui, Massimiliano
    Quaresima, Sara
    Vitali, Andrea
    Roggero, Pier Paolo
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 147 : 65 - 75
  • [10] Quantifying climate sensitivity and climate-driven change in North American amphibian communities
    Miller, David A. W.
    Grant, Evan H. Campbell
    Muths, Erin
    Amburgey, Staci M.
    Adams, Michael J.
    Joseph, Maxwell B.
    Waddle, J. Hardin
    Johnson, Pieter T. J.
    Ryan, Maureen E.
    Schmidt, Benedikt R.
    Calhoun, Daniel L.
    Davis, Courtney L.
    Fisher, Robert N.
    Green, David M.
    Hossack, Blake R.
    Rittenhouse, Tracy A. G.
    Walls, Susan C.
    Bailey, Larissa L.
    Cruickshank, Sam S.
    Fellers, Gary M.
    Gorman, Thomas A.
    Haas, Carola A.
    Hughson, Ward
    Pilliod, David S.
    Price, Steven J.
    Ray, Andrew M.
    Sadinski, Walt
    Saenz, Daniel
    Barichivich, William J.
    Brand, Adrianne
    Brehme, Cheryl S.
    Dagit, Rosi
    Delaney, Katy S.
    Glorioso, Brad M.
    Kats, Lee B.
    Kleeman, Patrick M.
    Pearl, Christopher A.
    Rochester, Carlton J.
    Riley, Seth P. D.
    Roth, Mark
    Sigafus, Brent H.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9