Impaired force-frequency relations in patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy - A possible physiological marker of the transition from physiological to pathological hypertrophy

被引:39
|
作者
Inagaki, M
Yokota, M
Izawa, H
Ishiki, R
Nagata, K
Iwase, M
Yamada, Y
Koide, M
Sobue, T
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Clin Lab Med, Nagoya, Aichi 466, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Nagoya, Aichi 466, Japan
[3] Nagoya Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Longev Sci, Dept Geriatr Res, Obu, Japan
[5] Natl Chubu Hosp, Obu, Japan
关键词
myocardial contraction; hypertrophy; hypertension;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.99.14.1822
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-The extent to which force-frequency and relaxation-frequency relations (FFR and RFR, respectively) and exercise-induced adrenergic stimulation affect myocardial inotropic and lusitropic reserves has not been established in patients with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH). Methods and Results-We calculated the maximum first derivative of LV pressure (LV dP/dt(max)) and the LV pressure half-time (T-1/2) during pacing, exercise, and isoproterenol infusion in 17 patients with hypertensive WH and 9 control subjects to investigate the influence of increases in heart rate (HR) and adrenergic stimulation on inotropic and lusitropic reserves. Group A consisted of 10 LVH patients who showed a progressive increase in the HR-LV dP/dt(max) relation. Group B consisted of 7 LVH patients in whom the HR-dP/dt(max) relation at physiological pacing rates was biphasic. The LV mass index was larger and the LV ejection fraction was smaller in group B than in group A (244+/-72 g/m(2) versus 172+/-22 g/m(2) and 55 +/- 18% versus 72+/-6%, respectively; both P<0.05). The increase in LV dP/dt(max) was seater during exercise than pacing alone for similar increases in HR in all groups (P<0.05) (group A, 111+/-22% versus 25+/-14%; group B, 105+/-355 versus 14+/-10%; control, 111+/-24% versus 25+/-12%). T-1/2 was shorter (P<0.05) during exercise than with pacing alone in all groups (group A, 41+/-6% versus 11+/-3%; group B, 38+/-9% versus 14+/-4%; control, 44+/-6% versus 12+/-5%). Isoproterenol infusion caused similar increases in LV dP/dt(max) and similar decreases in T-1/2 in all groups. Conclusions-The FFR was biphasic in patients with seven LVH irrespective of LV function but was preserved in patients with less severe LVH and control subjects. Importantly, the RFR and adrenergic control of both inotropic and lusitropic reserves were well preserved in all LVH patients. A biphasic FFR at physiological pacing rates may be one of the earliest markers of the transition from physiological adaptation to the pathological process in LVH patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1822 / 1830
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The biphasic force-frequency relation is a possible marker of the transition from physiological to pathological hypertrophy
    Mitsuhiro, Y
    Inagaki, M
    Izawa, H
    Ishiki, R
    Nagata, K
    Iwase, M
    Yamada, Y
    Koide, M
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 23 - 23
  • [2] Force-frequency relation in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and failure
    Kass, DA
    [J]. BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 93 : 108 - 116
  • [3] Force-frequency relation in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and failure
    Kass D.A.
    [J]. Basic Research in Cardiology, 1998, 93 (Suppl 1) : 108 - 116
  • [4] Doppler echocardiographic parameters in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: physiological versus pathological hypertrophy
    Plehn, G
    Schannwell, CM
    Marx, R
    Niebch, V
    Schoebel, FC
    Leschke, M
    Strauer, BE
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 : 683 - 683
  • [5] Can left ventricular pathological hypertrophy in hypertensives be distinguished from physiological hypertrophy in athletes?
    Schannwell, CM
    Marx, R
    Plehn, G
    Perings, C
    Leschke, M
    Strauer, BE
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2001, 126 (10) : 263 - 267
  • [6] Left ventricular hypertrophy: Physiological in athletes and pathological in hypertensive patients. More differences or similarities?
    Lonati, L
    Magnaghi, G
    Cuspidi, C
    Michev, I
    Leonetti, G
    Luca, HS
    Maggiore, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 21 : S32 - S33
  • [7] Pathological versus physiological left ventricular hypertrophy: A review
    Richey, PA
    Brown, SP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 1998, 16 (02) : 129 - 141
  • [8] LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN A COLLEGE ATHLETE: PHYSIOLOGICAL OR PATHOLOGICAL?
    Rao, Prashant
    Weiss, Max
    Johnson, Drew
    Bloom, Rob
    Malhotra, Aneil
    Shipon, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 2809 - 2809
  • [9] Echocardiographic differentiation of pathological and physiological left ventricular hypertrophy
    Hildick-Smith, DJR
    Shapiro, LM
    [J]. HEART, 2001, 85 (06) : 615 - 619
  • [10] Pathological and physiological left ventricular hypertrophy: echocardiography for differentiation
    Chelliah, Rajesh K.
    Senior, Roxy
    [J]. FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 5 (05) : 495 - 502