Randomized controlled study to evaluate the impact of flexible patient-controlled visits in people with type 1 diabetes: The DiabetesFlex Trial

被引:16
|
作者
Laurberg, Tinne [1 ]
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hjollund, Niels Henrik Ingvar [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Lomborg, Kirsten Elisabeth [3 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
Hansen, Troels Krarup [1 ,6 ]
Jensen, Annesofie Lunde [1 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Steno Diabet Ctr Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Reg Hosp West Jutland, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes, AmbuFlex, Ilerning, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, ResCenPI Res Ctr Patient Involvement, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Cent Denmark Reg, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Steno Diabet Ctr Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
关键词
diabetes mellitus type 1; disease management; patient participation; patient-initiated and patient-controlled; patient-reported outcome measures; randomized controlled trial; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FOLLOW-UP; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; EFFICACY; DISEASE; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/dme.14791
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim The objective of this study was to assess the impact of health care-initiated visits versus patient-controlled flexible visits on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes. Methods The DiabetesFlex trial was a randomized controlled, pragmatic non-inferiority 15-month follow-up study comparing standard care (face-to-face visits every 4 months) with DiabetesFlex (patient-controlled flexible visits using patient-reported, outcome-based telehealth follow-up). Of 343 enrolled participants, 160 in each group completed the study. The primary outcome was mean change in HbA(1c) from baseline to 15-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were blood pressure, lipid levels, frequency of visits, the World Health Organization score-five well-being-index (WHO-5), the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) scale and experience of participation in own care (participation score). Results The adjusted mean difference in HbA(1c) between standard care and DiabetesFlex was similar and below the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.4% (-0.03% [95%CI: 0.15, 0.11]/-0.27 mmol/mol [-1.71, 1.16]). No intergroup mean changes in lipid or blood pressure were observed. Conversely, DiabetesFlex participants presented an increased mean WHO-5 index of 4.5 (1.3, 7.3), participation score of 1.1 (0.5, 2.0), and decreased PAID score of -4.8 (-7.1, -2.6) compared with standard care. During follow-up, DiabetesFlex participants actively changed 23% of face-to-face visits to telephone consultations, cancelled more visits (17% vs. 9%), and stayed away without cancellation less often (2% vs. 8%). Conclusion Compared with standard care, flexible patient-controlled visits combined with patient-reported outcomes in participants with metabolic controlled type 1 diabetes and good psychological well-being further improved diabetes-related well-being and decreased face-to-face visits while maintaining safe diabetes management.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-controlled Sedation During Flexible Bronchoscopy A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Grossmann, Benjamin
    Nilsson, Andreas
    Sjoberg, Folke
    Nilsson, Lena
    JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 77 - 85
  • [2] A randomized trial of patient-controlled epidural versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia during labor
    Sharma, SK
    Leveno, KJ
    Messick, G
    Alexander, JM
    Sidawi, JE
    Wiley, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, : U8 - U8
  • [3] Comparison of Patient-Controlled Caudal Epidural Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Perianal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Xu, Le
    Zhang, Pei
    Long, Wei
    Wang, Rurong
    Li, Xuehan
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2022, 11 (03) : 1025 - 1035
  • [4] Comparison of Patient-Controlled Caudal Epidural Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Perianal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Le Xu
    Pei Zhang
    Wei Long
    Rurong Wang
    Xuehan Li
    Pain and Therapy, 2022, 11 : 1025 - 1035
  • [5] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Three Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Regimens for Labor
    Lim, Yvonne
    Ocampo, Cecilia E.
    Supandji, Mia
    Teoh, Wendy H. L.
    Sia, Alex T.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (06): : 1968 - 1972
  • [6] THE IMPACT OF SUPPORTED TELEMETRIC MONITORING IN PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: THE TELESCOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Wild, S.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2015, 241 (01) : E219 - E220
  • [7] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Patient-Controlled and Physician-Controlled Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Bell, Anthony
    Lipp, Trent
    Greenslade, Jaimi
    Chu, Kevin
    Rothwell, Sean
    Duncan, Alison
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (05) : 502 - 508
  • [8] A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Respiratory Effects of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Remifentanil Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women
    Stocki, Daniel
    Matot, Idit
    Einav, Sharon
    Eventov-Friedman, Smadar
    Ginosar, Yehuda
    Weiniger, Carolyn F.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 118 (03): : 589 - 597
  • [9] Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and remifentanil for ERCP: a randomized, controlled study
    Mazanikov, Maxim
    Udd, Marianne
    Kylanpaa, Leena
    Lindstrom, Outi
    Aho, Pekka
    Halttunen, Jorma
    Farkkila, Martti
    Poyhia, Reino
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (02) : 260 - 266
  • [10] The Impact of Remote Patient Monitoring on Glycated Hemoglobin for Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Nosrat, S.
    Myers, V.
    Nykaza, E.
    Calhoun, P.
    Philtron, J.
    Stem, K.
    Clements, M.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 197