Heterogenic institutional investors and their influence on corporate innovation: Evidence from a transition economy

被引:3
|
作者
Ali, Syed Tauseef [1 ]
Ali, Farman [1 ]
Khan, Adnan [2 ]
Yang, Zhen [3 ]
Ullah, Muhammad [4 ]
Ayalew, Misraku M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Management, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Dalian, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Clermont Auvergne, Sch Management, Clermont Ferrand, France
[5] Dilla Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Dept Accounting & Finance, Dilla, Ethiopia
关键词
corporate innovation; pressure-sensitive institutional investors; pressure-resistance institutional investors; R&D intensity; institutional investors; China; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FIRM INNOVATION; POLITICAL CONNECTIONS; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; CHINA;
D O I
10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2171
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose: The literature lacks a specific mechanism that may help to explain the variation in corporate innovation. This research helps to explain a specific mechanism that affects corporate innovation. Design/methodology/approach: Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression has been used to analyse the data collected from Chinese manufacturing firms listed on Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges from 2007 to 2015. Innovation input has been measured through research and development (R&D) expense scaled by total assets, while the number of forward invention patent citations has been used to measure the quality of innovation performance. Findings/results: The results show that pressure-resistance institutional investors (PR institutions) encourage, while pressure-sensitive institutional investors (PS institutions) discourage R&D intensity. Additionally, exploring the efficiency logic, results show that PR institutions positively moderate both in SOEs (state-owned enterprises) and non-SOEs, while in contrast, PS institutions negatively moderate only in non-SOEs. Overall, the results support our argument that institutional investors' business relations act as a mechanism that affects not only their fiduciary responsibilities, but also their proneness to pressure which in turn affects corporate innovation. Practical implications: There is a great need to protect institutional investors from forming business relations with firms in which they invest. This strategy will help institutional investors to perform their valuable role in enhancing corporate innovation. Originality/value: The article contributes to the existing literature by highlighting institutional investors' heterogenic behaviour. Second, this research highlights institutional investors' business relations, which affect R&D intensity and innovation performance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from an Emerging Economy
    Liu, Hao
    Tang, Xue
    Liu, Liyuan
    Lai, Hui
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (09) : 2096 - 2109
  • [2] Institutional investors and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China
    Yang, Zhen
    Su, Dongwei
    Xu, Shulin
    Han, Xu
    [J]. PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 29 (02) : 230 - 266
  • [3] Institutional investors, competition and corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms
    Zhang, Jing
    Li, Kai
    Long, Cheryl Xiaoning
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 2024, 32 (02) : 583 - 615
  • [4] Overseas institutional uncertainty and corporate innovation - evidence from an emerging economy
    Fu, Xiaoqing
    Liu, Zhaoyan
    Xie, Hongjun
    Zhang, Yang
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [5] Institutional investors' corporate site visits and corporate innovation
    Jiang, Xuanyu
    Yuan, Qingbo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 48 : 148 - 168
  • [6] CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS: EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIA
    Wahab, Effiezal Aswadi Abdul
    How, Janice
    Verhoeven, Peter
    [J]. ASIAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2008, 4 (02): : 67 - 90
  • [7] Qualified foreign institutional investors and corporate innovation: From the perspective of corporate governance
    Wang, Xiao
    Wang, Wanting
    Shi, Xiang Yan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] CAN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS INFLUENCE CORPORATE TAX ACTIVISM? FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF HETEROGENEOUS INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
    Yin, Na
    Li, Yanjin
    [J]. TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2023, 22 (02): : 225 - 249
  • [9] Institutional Investors and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China
    Xiong, Wanfang
    Dong, Mengming
    Xu, Cheng
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2023, 59 (10) : 3281 - 3292
  • [10] Do institutional investors facilitate corporate environmental innovation?
    Xu, Jia
    Zeng, Shu
    Qi, Shaozhou
    Cui, Jingbo
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 117