Responding to requests for dialysis for severely demented and brain injured patients
被引:6
|
作者:
Spike, Jeffrey P.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Florida State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Humanities & Social Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USAFlorida State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Humanities & Social Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
Spike, Jeffrey P.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Florida State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Humanities & Social Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
Nephrologists, like all physicians, need to offer their patients all reasonable treatment options, but only the reasonable options. When dialysis is (or is not) a reasonable option is an important ethical issue. The justification for dialysis, like any life-sustaining treatment, is that it prolongs life for a patient who either wishes to live or, if cognitively impaired, would (in the opinion of others) likely benefit from extending their life. This article focuses on patients with advanced dementia or severe and irreversible brain injury who are no longer capable of enjoying life, and hence gain no benefit from dialysis. I present guidelines for withholding and withdrawing dialysis and offer suggestions designed to help nephrologists avoid causing harm when the patient's family demands that dialysis be performed.
机构:
Columbia Univ, Dept Neurol, Div Crit Care Neurol, Milstein Hosp Ctr 8, New York, NY 10032 USA
Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Clin Neurol, Neurol Intens Care Unit, A-6020 Innsbruck, AustriaColumbia Univ, Dept Neurol, Div Crit Care Neurol, Milstein Hosp Ctr 8, New York, NY 10032 USA
Helbok, Raimund
Badjatia, Neeraj
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Columbia Univ, Dept Neurol, Div Crit Care Neurol, Milstein Hosp Ctr 8, New York, NY 10032 USAColumbia Univ, Dept Neurol, Div Crit Care Neurol, Milstein Hosp Ctr 8, New York, NY 10032 USA