Validation for performing 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET studies on the same day

被引:2
|
作者
Mitsumoto, Takuya [1 ,3 ]
Kubota, Kazuo
Sato, Takashi
Morooka, Miyako
Minamimoto, Ryogo
Shimbo, Takuro [2 ]
Muramatsu, Yoshihisa
Sasaki, Toru
Ito, Kimiteru [4 ]
Fukushi, Masahiro [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Res Inst, Dept Radiol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628655, Japan
[2] Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Res Inst, Dept Clin Res & Informat, Tokyo 1628655, Japan
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol Sci, Tokyo 158, Japan
[4] Natl Ctr Neurol & Psychiat, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
dual tracers; fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose; methionine; PET/computed tomography; positron cross-talk; quality assurance; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; CARBON-11-METHIONINE PET; CANCER; TUMORS; LUNG; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; METHIONINE; FDG;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0b013e32834dfa38
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background and objective The performance of two PET examinations, one using L-[methyl-C-11] methionine (MET) and one using 2-[F-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), on the same day may offer a clinical advantage for the investigation of brain tumors or other lesions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of positron crosstalk (PCT) and to determine the optimal protocol for using MET and FDG on the same day. Methods The participants comprised 62 patients with head and neck cancer. We focused on the high physiological uptake of MET in the liver and evaluated the effect of PCT with MET on FDG uptake in the liver and muscle. Three FDG-PET scans [one: whole body (early image), two: head and neck, and three: one-bed-position scan of the liver (delayed image)] were performed after completing a MET-PET scan (head and neck) at varying injection intervals. Standard uptake value mean variations in the liver and muscle were calculated, assuming that the differences between the early and the delayed images reflected the PCT from carbon-11 on fluorine-18, on the basis of the results of a phantom study and a study in volunteers. The participants were categorized into four groups (G) according to the injection interval: G1 (n=15, 30-49 min), G2 (n=16, 50-69 min), G3 (n=17, 70-89 min), and G4 (n=14, >= 90 min). Results The PCT level decreased from the G1 group through to the G3 group (analysis of variance, P<0.001) but was stable, with no further decrease in the G4 group. The PCT level in the muscle was not significantly different among the G1, G2, G3, and G4 groups (analysis of variance, P=0.693). Thus, PCT in the liver decreased at longer injection intervals, and PCT was no longer observed at injection intervals of more than 90 min. Conclusion MET and FDG-PET examinations can be successfully performed on the same day without PCT between the studies if the injection interval is longer than 90 min. This method reduces the examination burden of patients and may be useful for performing multiple PET examinations while the patient's condition remains almost the same. Nucl Med Commun 33:297-304 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 304
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation for two PET studies using 18F-FDG and 11C-Methionine on the same day
    Mitsumoto, Takuya
    Sato, Takashi
    Morooka, Miyako
    Minamimoto, Ryogo
    Kubota, Kazuo
    Ito, Kimiteru
    Fukushi, Masahiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [2] 11C-Acetate PET in the Evaluation of Brain Glioma: Comparison with 11C-Methionine and 18F-FDG-PET
    Y. Yamamoto
    Y. Nishiyama
    N. Kimura
    R. Kameyama
    N. Kawai
    T. Hatakeyama
    M. Kaji
    M. Ohkawa
    [J]. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2008, 10
  • [3] Establishment of the method for double PET study to use 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG on the same day
    Mitsumoto, T.
    Sato, T.
    Fuzita, K.
    Muramatsu, S.
    Kodaka, K.
    Morooka, M.
    Minamimoto, S.
    Kubota, K.
    Fukushi, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 : S491 - S491
  • [4] 11C-acetate PET in the evaluation of brain glioma:: Comparison with 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET
    Yamamoto, Y.
    Nishiyama, Y.
    Kimura, N.
    Kameyama, R.
    Kawai, N.
    Hatakeyama, T.
    Kaji, M.
    Ohkawa, M.
    [J]. MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 10 (05) : 281 - 287
  • [5] The evaluation of the lesion detectability for performing 11C-Methionine and 18F-FDG PET on the same day based on NEMA/IEC body phantom
    Mitsumoto, T.
    Kubota, K.
    Minamimoto, R.
    Morooka, M.
    Fukushi, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 : S456 - S456
  • [6] Clinical use of 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET for germinoma in central nervous system
    Okochi, Yoshiyuki
    Nihashi, Takashi
    Fujii, Masazumi
    Kato, Katsuhiko
    Okada, Yumiko
    Ando, Yoshio
    Maesawa, Satoshi
    Takebayashi, Shigenori
    Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
    Naganawa, Shinji
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (02) : 94 - 102
  • [7] Clinical use of 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET for germinoma in central nervous system
    Yoshiyuki Okochi
    Takashi Nihashi
    Masazumi Fujii
    Katsuhiko Kato
    Yumiko Okada
    Yoshio Ando
    Satoshi Maesawa
    Shigenori Takebayashi
    Toshihiko Wakabayashi
    Shinji Naganawa
    [J]. Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2014, 28 : 94 - 102
  • [8] Are 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET both necessary for parathyroid imaging?
    Chicklore, Sugama
    Schulte, Klaus-Martin
    Talat, Nadia
    Hubbard, Johnathan
    Cook, Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53
  • [9] Comparison of 18F-FDG and 11C-Methionine PET in patients with suspected gliomas
    Roudas, M
    Skvortsova, T
    Brodskaja, Z
    Medvedev, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (08): : 1100 - 1100
  • [10] 11C-methionine PET as a prognostic marker in patients with glioma:: comparison with 18F-FDG PET
    Kim, S
    Chung, JK
    Im, SH
    Jeong, JM
    Lee, DS
    Kim, DG
    Jung, HW
    Lee, MC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2005, 32 (01) : 52 - 59