CZT camera systems may provide better risk stratification for low-risk patients

被引:5
|
作者
Miller, Robert J. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Han, Donghee [1 ,2 ]
Rozanski, Alan [4 ,5 ]
Gransar, Heidi [1 ,2 ]
Friedman, John D. [1 ,2 ]
Hayes, Sean [1 ,2 ]
Thomson, Louise [1 ,2 ]
Tamarappoo, Balaji [1 ,2 ]
Slomka, Piotr J. [1 ,2 ]
Berman, Daniel S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Imaging, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Cardiac Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Mt Sinai St Lukes Hosp, Div Cardiol, Mt Sinai Heart, New York, NY USA
[5] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
SPECT; myocardial perfusion imaging; CZT; VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION; EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; SPECT CAMERA; VALIDATION; BENEFIT; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s12350-020-02128-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The photon sensitivity and spatial resolution of single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) has been significantly improved by solid-state camera systems using cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detectors. While the diagnostic accuracy of these systems is well established, there is little evidence directly comparing the prognostic utility to conventional NaI cameras. Methods and Results Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing SPECT between 2008 and 2012. Visual SPECT assessment was performed utilizing the 17-segment model to determine summed stress scores (SSS). We identified 12,830 consecutive patients, mean age 63.2 +/- 13.7 and 56.1% male, 5072 of whom underwent CZT and 7758 NaI imaging. During a median follow-up duration of 7.0 years (IQR 5.5-8.2), a total of 2788 (21.7%) patients died. Compared to SSS 0, minimal perfusion abnormality (SSS 1-3) was associated with increased all-cause mortality with CZT camera (adjusted HR 1.32, P = .017) and NaI camera (adjusted HR 1.29, P = .001, interaction P = .803). Increasing stress abnormality was associated with a similar increase in risk with CZT or NaI imaging (interaction P > .500). In a propensity matched analysis, patients with normal perfusion stress perfusion assessed with a CZT was associated with decreased mortality compared to normal perfusion assessed by a NaI camera system (hazard ratio .88, 95% CI .78-.99, P = .040). Conclusions Increasing stress perfusion abnormality was associated with similar increase in all-cause mortality with CZT or NaI cameras. CZT and NaI camera systems provide similar risk stratification, however, normal myocardial perfusion may be associated with a more benign prognosis when assessed with a CZT camera system.
引用
收藏
页码:2927 / 2936
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CZT camera systems may provide better risk stratification for low-risk patients
    Robert J. H. Miller
    Donghee Han
    Alan Rozanski
    Heidi Gransar
    John D. Friedman
    Sean Hayes
    Louise Thomson
    Balaji Tamarappoo
    Piotr J. Slomka
    Daniel S. Berman
    [J]. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021, 28 : 2927 - 2936
  • [2] Is there an adequate risk stratification? Are low-risk patients treated better than high-risk patients?
    Hamm, Christian
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2006, 131 (47) : S203 - S203
  • [3] Low-risk chest pain patients may be at high risk for cardiac events: Prospective use of troponin T for risk stratification
    Parmar, RJ
    Abreo, G
    Uretsky, BF
    Runge, MS
    deFilippi, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) : 91A - 91A
  • [5] Oral antibiotics better in low-risk cancer patients
    Bonn, D
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9177): : 490 - 490
  • [6] Impact of Bone Marrow Biopsy on Risk Stratification of Low-Risk IgG MGUS Patients
    Bustoros, Mark
    Kastritis, Eftathios
    Liu, Chia-Jen
    Kanellias, Nikolaos
    Liu, David
    Gavriatopoulou, Maria
    Glen, Adriana Perilla
    Roussou, Maria
    Henrick, Patrick
    Migkou, Magdalini
    Savell, Alexandra
    Noonan, Kimberly
    Reyes, Kaitlen
    Rivotto, Bradley
    Leblebjian, Houry
    Paba-Prada, Claudia
    Ziogas, Dimitrios C.
    Laubach, Jacob
    Schlossman, Robert L.
    Anderson, Kenneth C.
    Richardson, Paul G.
    Ghobrial, Irene M.
    Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
    [J]. BLOOD, 2017, 130
  • [7] Risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: The need for continued vigilance in "low-risk" patients
    Levinsky, MJ
    Ohman, EM
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (05) : 750 - 752
  • [8] Which patients with low-risk treadmill scores need perfusion imaging for risk stratification?
    Poornima, IG
    Gibbons, RJ
    Christian, TF
    Hodge, DO
    Miller, TD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (02) : 213A - 213A
  • [9] RISK STRATIFICATION IN LOW-RISK HYPERTENSIVE INDIVIDUALS IN A COHORT STUDY
    Valencia-Hernandez, Carlos A.
    Mceniery, Carmel
    Wilkinson, Ian B.
    Lindbohm, Joni
    Shipley, Martin J.
    Brunner, Eric J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2021, 39 : E172 - E172
  • [10] Pneumonia surveillance and its attendant clinical risk stratification for COVID-19 in low-risk patients
    Huang, Wenhui
    Chai, Gin Tsen
    Thong, Yu Hor Bernard
    Chan, Peng Chew Mark
    Ang, Sze Peng Brenda
    Chow, Li Ping Angela
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 190 : 89 - 92