A Multiple Criteria Decision Making System for Setting Priorities

被引:2
|
作者
Freire, Sergio Miranda [1 ]
Nascimento, Aline [2 ]
de Almeida, Rosimary Terezinha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
Multiple criteria decision making; Priority setting; Group decision; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_65
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The demand for improvement in the quality and cost control in health care stimulates the utilization of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach, which is a sub-discipline of operations research that explicitly evaluates multiple conflicting criteria in decision making. The aim of this paper was to develop a user-friendly multiple criteria decision making support system in order to facilitate the application of an MCDM method by decision-makers. The system was developed in Java and compares alternatives (i.e., technologies or projects) by a single or a group of individuals with a set of criteria evaluated by means of an ordinal or numeric scale. An ordinal scale is used to set the weights for each criterion. Then an MCDM method, known as TODIM (Tomada de Decisao Interativa Multicriterio, in Portuguese), aggregates the values attributed to each alternative for each criterion in order to obtain a ranking of the alternatives for each individual. Finally, some fuzzy aggregation methods are applied in order to reach a group decision. The preferences of eleven decision-makers, members of a graduate course in Health Technology Assessment at Rio de Janeiro, based on seven criteria, was obtained for three oncological medicine alternatives. Besides allowing the decision-makers to set the scenario of the priority setting process (specification of alternatives, criteria, evaluators and criteria scales), the system shows all the intermediate steps of the decision process, and how individual preferences are formed. Through its output, it is possible to identify patterns in the individual preferences, the most influential criteria, and to perform a sensitivity analysis in order to show how the outcome is sensitive to changes in the alternatives' evaluations. In this way the system brings transparency to the decision making process.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 361
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multiple criteria decision making system for setting priorities
    Freire, Sergio Miranda
    Nascimento, Aline
    de Almeida, Rosimary Terezinha
    [J]. IFMBE Proceedings, 2019, 68 (01) : 357 - 361
  • [2] Multiple criteria decision making for setting priorities of investments into the table egg production
    Crncan, A.
    Kristic, J.
    Ranogajec, Lj
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2013, 69 (04) : 903 - 908
  • [3] Multi-criteria decision making - An approach to setting priorities in health care
    Nobre, FF
    Trotta, LTF
    Gomes, LFAM
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1999, 18 (23) : 3345 - 3354
  • [4] System dynamics and multiple-criteria decision making
    Gottschalk, Petter
    [J]. SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 1986, 2 (01) : 67 - 67
  • [5] Multiple Criteria Decision Making in Distribution System Planning
    Sahin, Ismail
    Bagriyanik, Mustafa
    [J]. 2015 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING (ELECO), 2015, : 453 - 457
  • [6] Flood risk management for setting priorities in decision making
    Plate, Erich J.
    [J]. EXTREME HYDROLOGICAL EVENTS: NEW CONCEPTS FOR SECURITY, 2007, 78 : 21 - 44
  • [7] Therapy Goal Setting and Decision Making Criteria
    Alt-Epping, Bernd
    Bausewein, Claudia
    Voltz, Raymond
    Simon, Steffen T.
    Pralong, Anne
    Simon, Alfred
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PALLIATIVMEDIZIN, 2020, 21 (02): : 81 - 93
  • [8] Pointing to Priorities for Multiple Criteria Decision Making: The Case of a MIS-Based Project in China
    Ai, Shizhong
    Du, Rong
    Brugha, Cathal M.
    Wang, Hongpeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2016, 15 (03) : 683 - 702
  • [9] TWO CRITERIA IN MULTIPLE DECISION MAKING
    Mykhalevich, V. M.
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2012, 48 (02) : 217 - 226
  • [10] Two criteria in multiple decision making
    V. M. Mykhalevich
    [J]. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2012, 48 (2) : 217 - 226