Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods

被引:136
|
作者
Ishizaka, Alessio [1 ]
Siraj, Sajid [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, CORL, Portsmouth Business Sch, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Business Sch, Ctr Decis Res, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol, Wah Cantonment, Pakistan
关键词
Decision analysis; SMART; AHP; MACBETH; Experimental evaluation; UTILITY; ACCEPTANCE; SET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.041
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Many decision makers still question the usefulness of multi-criteria decision-making methods and prefer to rely on intuitive decisions. In this study we evaluated a number of multi-criteria decision-making tools for their usefulness using incentive-based experiments, which is a novel approach in operations research but common in psychology and experimental economics. In this experiment the participants were asked to compare five coffee shops to win a voucher for their best-rated shop. We found that, although the usefulness of different multi-criteria decision-making tools varied to some extent, all the tools were found to be useful in the sense that, when they decided to change their ranking, they followed the recommendation of the multi-criteria decision-making tool. Moreover, the level of inconsistency in the judgements provided had no significant effect on the usefulness of these tools. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 471
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of three categories of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Li, Yingfang
    He, Xingxing
    Martinez, Luis
    Zhang, Jiafeng
    Wang, Danchen
    Liu, Xueqin Amy
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [2] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    [J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [3] Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study
    Ben-Arieh, D
    [J]. INTERFACES, 2002, 32 (02) : 81 - 83
  • [4] Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study
    Athawale, Vijay Manikrao
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART L-JOURNAL OF MATERIALS-DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 226 (L4) : 266 - 285
  • [5] Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: A comparative study
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government Polytechnic, India
    不详
    [J]. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mat. Des. Appl., 4 (266-285):
  • [6] A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment
    Farahnaz Rashidi
    Shadi Sharifian
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194
  • [7] A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment
    Rashidi, Farahnaz
    Sharifian, Shadi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (09)
  • [8] Evaluation of three multi-criteria decision-making methods in Ecosystem Management
    Pavlikakis, Georgios E.
    Tsihrintzis, Vassillos A.
    [J]. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Vol B, Poster Presentations, 2003, : 667 - 674
  • [9] Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for Sustainable Decision-making in the Mining Industry (A Comprehensive Study)
    Pouresmaieli, Mahdi
    Ataei, Mohammad
    Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri
    Barabadi, Abbas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 15 (02): : 683 - 706
  • [10] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187