Prognostic value of SUVmax in breast cancer and comparative analyses of molecular subtypes A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Lee, Moon Il [1 ]
Jung, Youn Joo [2 ]
Kim, Dong Il [2 ]
Lee, Seungju [2 ]
Jung, Chang Shin [2 ]
Kang, Seok Kyung [2 ]
Pak, Kyoungjune [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Seong Jang [5 ]
Kim, Hyun Yul [2 ]
机构
[1] Hwamyoung Ilsin Christian Hosp, Breast Surg, Pusan, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Yangsan Hosp, Yangsan, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Busan, South Korea
[4] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Busan, South Korea
[5] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Yangsan Hosp, Yangsan, South Korea
关键词
breast cancer; meta-analysis; prognostic value; SUVmax; PREOPERATIVE F-18-FDG PET/CT; SURVIVAL; TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; RECURRENCE; PARAMETERS; THERAPY; RATIO;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000026745
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To assess the prognostic capability of the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) measured in the primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) by pretreatment fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and analyze outcomes according to the molecular breast cancer subtypes. Methods: The databases were systematically searched using keywords for breast cancer, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and SUVmax; the extracted studies reported at least 1 form of survival data, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival. Comparative analyses of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and overall survival were performed to assess their correlations with SUVmax. The pooled HR was estimated using random-effects model according to the results of heterogeneity. Results: Thirteen eligible studies comprising 3040 patients with breast cancer were included. The pooled HRs of high SUVmax in the primary tumor and ALN were 3.01 (95% CI 1.83-4.97, P < .00001; I2 = 82%) and 3.72 (95% CI 1.15-12.01; I2 = 92%; P = .03), respectively. Patients with higher SUVmax demonstrated a poorer survival prognosis. Furthermore, comparative analyses according to the molecular subtypes demonstrated that the SUVmax in the primary tumor or ALN can be a predictive parameter in patients with the luminal subtype disease. Subtype analysis results indicated a significant association of the luminal group, with a HR of 2.65 (95% CI 1.31-5.37; I2 = 27%; P = .007). Conclusions: SUVmax from pretreatment is a significant prognostic factor for EFS in patients with breast cancer. Despite several limitations, correlation with molecular subtype (luminal type) was demonstrated. Further large-scale studies are required to investigate the precise prognostic capability of SUVmax.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prevalence of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in India: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Pavan Kumar Jonnada
    Cherukuru Sushma
    Madhuri Karyampudi
    Anvesh Dharanikota
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 12 : 152 - 163
  • [2] Prevalence of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in India: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jonnada, Pavan Kumar
    Sushma, Cherukuru
    Karyampudi, Madhuri
    Dharanikota, Anvesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (SUPPL 1) : 152 - 163
  • [3] The prognostic role of circulating tumor DNA across breast cancer molecular subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Nana
    Zhou, Qingxin
    Zhang, Meng
    Chen, Xiaowei
    Zeng, Baoqi
    Wu, Shanshan
    Zeng, Hongmei
    Wang, Mopei
    Ma, Fei
    Sun, Feng
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER, 2024, 4 (02): : 153 - 161
  • [4] Clinical Value of Consensus Molecular Subtypes in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    ten Hoorn, Sanne
    de Back, Tim R.
    Sommeijer, Dirkje W.
    Vermeulen, Louis
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 114 (04): : 503 - 516
  • [5] Prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes in hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schettini, F.
    Martinez-Saez, O.
    Falato, C.
    De Santo, I.
    Conte, B.
    Garcia-Fructuoso, I.
    Gomez-Bravo, R.
    Segui, E.
    Chic, N.
    Braso-Maristany, F.
    Pare, L.
    Vidal, M.
    Adamo, B.
    Munoz, M.
    Pascual, T.
    Ciruelos, E.
    Perou, C. M.
    Carey, L. A.
    Prat, A.
    ESMO OPEN, 2023, 8 (03)
  • [6] Diabetes and incidence of breast cancer and its molecular subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiong, Fanxiu
    Dai, Qichen
    Zhang, Sihan
    Bent, Stephen
    Tahir, Peggy
    Van Blarigan, Erin L.
    Kenfield, Stacey A.
    Chan, June M. M.
    Schmajuk, Gabriela
    Graff, Rebecca E.
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2024, 40 (01)
  • [7] Prognostic Value of Galectin Expression in Patients with Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ramos-Martinez, Juan Carlos
    Altamirano-Gomez, Gerardo
    Ramos-Martinez, Ivan
    Valencia, Jorge
    Hernandez-Zimbron, Luis
    Hernandez-Juarez, Jesus
    Echeverria-Vasquez, Patricia
    Hernandez-Gonzalez, Leticia L.
    Perez-Campos, Eduardo
    Mayoral, Laura Perez-Campos
    Ramos-Martinez, Edgar
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2022, 22 (05) : 399 - 409
  • [8] Prognostic value of FOXA1 in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shou, Jiafeng
    Lai, Yucheng
    Xu, Jinming
    Huang, Jian
    BREAST, 2016, 27 : 35 - 43
  • [9] Prognostic value of dysadherin in cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niinivirta, Aino
    Salo, Tuula
    Astrom, Pirjo
    Juurikka, Krista
    Risteli, Maija
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [10] Association of reproductive risk factors and breast cancer molecular subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xihua Mao
    Chioma Omeogu
    Shama Karanth
    Ashwini Joshi
    Clare Meernik
    Lauren Wilson
    Amy Clark
    April Deveaux
    Chunyan He
    Tisha Johnson
    Karen Barton
    Samantha Kaplan
    Tomi Akinyemiju
    BMC Cancer, 23