Pharmacoeconomic modeling of lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol for continuous sedation in critically ill patients

被引:17
|
作者
MacLaren, R
Sullivan, PW
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Pharmaceut Outcomes Res Program, Denver, CO 80262 USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2005年 / 25卷 / 10期
关键词
critical care; sedation; lorazepam; midazolam; propofol; pharmacoeconomics; cost-analyses;
D O I
10.1592/phco.2005.25.10.1319
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Study Objective. To compare the expected costs of short-, intermediate-, and long-term sedation (< 24, 24-72, and > 72 hrs, respectively) with propofol, lorazepam, and midazolam in an intensive care unit. Methods. Decision-analysis models were constructed for each sedative and each duration by using institutional costs associated with drug administration and adverse events (including personnel time). Costs were A expressed in 2002 U.S. dollars. Adverse events were agitation, hypertriglyceridemia and/or pancreatitis, hypotension, nutritional changes, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and prolonged awakening and/or extubation. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to obtain durations of sedation, the incidence of outcomes, and cost estimates of outcomes. The ability to maintain specific levels of sedation was assumed equivalent among the sedatives. Univariate sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the cost-driving variables, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted by using second-order Monte Carlo simulations. Results. Weighted mean durations of sedation from 50 studies were 13.46 (short term), 45.27 (intermediate term), and 119.78 (long term) hours. Expected costs for sedation with lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol, respectively, were $497, $294, and $272 short term; $932, $587, and $674 intermediate term; and $1604, $1737, and $2033 long term. Propofol was least costly in 86% of the short-term simulations, midazolam was least costly in 97.5% of the intermediate-term simulations, and lorazepam was least costly in 84% of the long-term simulations. The most important cost-driver for all sedatives was drug cost. Prolonged extubation after sedation was an important cost-driver for lorazepam and midazolam, especially as sedation was lengthened. Conclusion. Propofol, midazolam, and lorazepam had the lowest expected costs for short-, intermediate-, and long-term sedation, respectively. Many factors aside from drug costs influenced the cost of sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1328
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CONTINUOUS-INFUSION SEDATION LORAZEPAM VERSUS MIDAZOLAM IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Ammar, Mahmoud
    Ammar, Abdalla
    Owusu, Kent
    Siner, Jonathan
    Chess, Adam
    Johnson, Jennifer
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [2] Propofol and midazolam for sedation of the critically ill
    Swann, D
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (10) : 1761 - 1761
  • [3] PROPOFOL VS MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    BERENYI, T
    MEZOFI, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 : 113 - 113
  • [4] COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    AITKENHEAD, AR
    WILLATTS, SM
    PARK, GR
    COLLINS, CH
    LEDINGHAM, IM
    PEPPERMAN, ML
    COATES, PD
    BODENHAM, AR
    SMITH, MB
    WALLACE, PGM
    [J]. LANCET, 1989, 2 (8665): : 704 - 709
  • [5] Continuous infusions of lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol for sedation of the critically ill surgery trauma patient: A prospective, randomized comparison
    McCollam, JS
    O'Neil, MG
    Norcross, ED
    Byrne, TK
    Reeves, ST
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (11) : 2454 - 2458
  • [6] Continuous infusions of lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol for sedation of the critically-ill surgery trauma patient: A prospective, randomized, comparison
    Reeves, ST
    McCollam, JS
    O'Neil, MG
    Norcross, ED
    Byrne, TK
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (01) : A167 - A167
  • [7] Sedation of critically ill patients during mechanical ventilation - A comparison of propofol and midazolam
    Kress, JP
    OConnor, MF
    Pohlman, AS
    Olson, D
    Lavoie, A
    Toledano, A
    Hall, JB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 153 (03) : 1012 - 1018
  • [8] Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: Impact on weaning and costs
    BarrientosVega, R
    SanchezSoria, MM
    MoralesGarcia, C
    RobasGomez, A
    CuenaBoy, R
    AyensaRincon, A
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [9] Propofol versus midazolam in critically ill patients - Reply
    Chamorro, C
    deLatorre, FJ
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (03) : 554 - 555
  • [10] CONTINUOUS SEDATION WITH MIDAZOLAM IN OBESE VS NON-OBESE CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Genkina, Yuliya
    Mancl, Erin
    Rech, Megan
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (12)