External-Cost Estimation of Electricity Generation in G20 Countries: Case Study Using a Global Life-Cycle Impact-Assessment Method

被引:34
|
作者
Karkour, Selim [1 ]
Ichisugi, Yuki [1 ]
Abeynayaka, Amila [1 ]
Itsubo, Norihiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo City Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2248551, Japan
关键词
electricity generation; external cost; life-cycle assessment; life-cycle impact assessment; fossil fuels; renewables; G20; newly industrialized countries; HEALTH DAMAGE FACTORS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES; CARBON CAPTURE; AIR-POLLUTION; POWER-PLANT; BIOMASS; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; EMISSIONS; POLLUTANTS;
D O I
10.3390/su12052002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The external costs derived from the environmental impacts of electricity generation can be significant and should not be underrated, as their consideration can be useful to establish a ranking between different electricity generation sources to inform decision-makers. The aim of this research is to transparently evaluate the recent external cost of electricity generation in G20 countries using a global life-cycle impact-assessment (LCIA) method: life cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modeling (LIME3). The weighting factors developed in the LIME3 method for each G20 country enable one to convert the different environmental impacts (not only climate change and air pollution) resulting from the emissions and resources consumption during the full lifecycle of electricity generation-from resource extraction to electricity generation-into a monetary value. Moreover, in LIME3, not only the weighting factors are developed for each G20 country but also all the impact categories. Using this method, it was possible to determine accurately which resources or emission had an environmental impact in each country. This study shows that the countries relying heavily on coal, such as India (0.172 $/kWh) or Indonesia (0.135 $/kWh) have the highest external costs inside the G20, with air pollution and climate accounting together for more than 80% of the costs. In these two countries, the ratio of the external cost/market price was the highest in the G20, at 2.3 and 1.7, respectively. On the other hand, countries with a higher reliance on renewable energies, such as Canada (0.008 $/kWh) or Brazil (0.012 $/kWh) have lower induced costs. When comparing with the market price, it has to be noted also that for instance Canada is able to generate cheap electricity with a low-external cost. For most of the other G20 countries, this cost was estimated at between about 0.020$ and 0.040 $/kWh. By estimating the external cost of each electricity generation technology available in each G20 country, this study also highlighted that sometimes the external cost of the electricity generated from one specific technology can be significant even when using renewables due to resource scarcity-for example, the 0.068 $/kWh of electricity generated from hydropower in India. This information, missing from most previous studies, should not be omitted by decision makers when considering which type of electricity generation source to prioritize.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Sustainability Analysis of Electricity Generation Technologies Based on Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost-A Case Study in Liaoning Province
    Yue, Qiang
    Li, Shupeng
    Hu, Xiangzheng
    Zhang, Yujie
    Xue, Meng
    Wang, Heming
    [J]. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 7 (07)
  • [2] Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Electricity-Generation Technologies: West Texas Case Study
    Das, Jani
    Ur Rehman, Atta
    Verma, Rahul
    Gulen, Gurcan
    Young, Michael H.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (05)
  • [3] External environmental costs of electricity generation using a life cycle approach: A case study of Spain
    San Miguel, Guillermo
    [J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 237
  • [4] Rethinking Wastewater-Treatment Infrastructure: Case Study Using Life-Cycle Cost and Life-Cycle Assessment to Highlight Sustainability Considerations
    Glick, Scott
    Guggemos, Angela Acree
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (12)
  • [5] Global warming impact of electricity generation from beef cattle manure: A life cycle assessment study
    Ghafoori, Emad
    Flynn, Peter C.
    Checkel, M. David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2006, 3 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [6] Use of Environmental Life Cycle Impact Assessment for power generation systems: Canadian electricity Association case study
    Kommonen, Fjalar
    Rhodes, Stanley
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2006, : 71 - +
  • [7] Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Electricity-Generation Technologies: West Texas Case Study.(vol 17, 992, 2024)
    Das, Jani
    Rehman, Atta Ur
    Verma, Rahul
    Gulen, Gurcan
    Young, Michael H.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (10)
  • [8] Calculation of optimum insulation thickness of external walls in residential buildings by using exergetic life cycle cost assessment method: Case study for Turkey
    Guven, Sengul
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 38 (06)
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment of Battery Electric and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles Considering the Impact of Electricity Generation Mix: A Case Study in China
    Tang, Bowen
    Xu, Yi
    Wang, Mingyang
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [10] Interpretable machine learning method empowers dynamic life cycle impact assessment: A case study on the carcinogenic impact of coal power generation
    Wang, Shuo
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Li, Ziheng
    Wang, Kang
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2025, 112