Seagrass detection in the mediterranean: A supervised learning approach

被引:28
|
作者
Effrosynidis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Arampatzis, Avi [1 ]
Sylaios, Georgios [2 ]
机构
[1] Democritus Univ Thrace, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Database & Informat Retrieval Res unit, GR-67100 Xanthi, Greece
[2] Democritus Univ Thrace, Dept Environm Engn, Lab Ecol Engn & Technol, GR-67100 Xanthi, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Seagrass classification; Dataset integration and fusion; Machine learning; Data mining; Mediterranean Sea; POSIDONIA-OCEANICA; REGRESSION; MODELS; GROWTH; BAY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; DISTRIBUTIONS; PHOSPHORUS; POLLUTION; SALINITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.09.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We deal with the problem of detecting seagrass presence/absence and distinguishing seagrass families in the Mediterranean via supervised learning methods. By merging datasets about seagrass presence and other external environmental variables, we develop suitable training data, enhanced by seagrass absence data algorithmically produced based on certain hypotheses. Experiments comparing several popular classification algorithms yield up to 93.4% accuracy in detecting seagrass presence. In a feature strength analysis, the most important variables determining presence-absence are found to be Chlorophyll-alpha levels and Distance-to-Coast. For determining family, variables cannot be easily singled out; several different variables seem to be of importance, with Chlorophyll-alpha surpassing all others. In both problems, tree-based classification algorithms perform better than others, with Random Forest being the most effective. Hidden preferences reveal that Cymodocea and Posidonia favor the low, limited-range chlorophyll-alpha levels (< 0.5 mg/m(3)), Halophila tolerates higher salinities ( > 39), while Ruppia prefers euryhaline conditions (37.5-39).
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 170
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A supervised learning approach for heading detection
    Budhiraja, Sahib Singh
    Mago, Vijay
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2020, 37 (04)
  • [2] A Supervised Learning Approach to Flashlight Detection
    Chen, Liang-Hua
    Hsu, Bi-Cheng
    Su, Chih-Wen
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 48 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [3] Multi-species Seagrass Detection Using Semi-supervised Learning
    Noman, Md Kislu
    Islam, Syed Mohammed Shamsul
    Abu-Khalaf, Jumana
    Lavery, Paul
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 36TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING NEW ZEALAND (IVCNZ), 2021,
  • [4] Supervised Learning Approach for Twitter Credibility Detection
    Hassan, Noha Y.
    Gomaa, Wael H.
    Khoriba, Ghada A.
    Haggag, Mohammed H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS (ICCES), 2018, : 196 - 201
  • [5] Sarcasm Detection on Facebook: A Supervised Learning Approach
    Das, Dipto
    Clark, Anthony J.
    [J]. ICMI'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION: ADJUNCT, 2018,
  • [6] Assessment of Machine Learning Methods for Seagrass Classification in the Mediterranean
    Bakirman, Tolga
    Gumusay, Mustafa Umit
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING, 2020, 8 (02): : 315 - 326
  • [7] SemiContour: A Semi-supervised Learning Approach for Contour Detection
    Zhang, Zizhao
    Xing, Fuyong
    Shi, Xiaoshuang
    Yang, Lin
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, : 251 - 259
  • [8] FoodAlytics: a Formalin Detection System Incorporating a Supervised Learning Approach
    Saha, Swapnil Sayan
    Siraj, Md. Sadman
    Bin Habib, Walid
    [J]. 2017 IEEE REGION 10 HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (R10-HTC), 2017, : 26 - 29
  • [9] Semi-supervised machine learning approach for DDoS detection
    Idhammad, Mohamed
    Afdel, Karim
    Belouch, Mustapha
    [J]. APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 48 (10) : 3193 - 3208
  • [10] A semi-supervised learning approach for detection of phishing webpages
    Li, Yuancheng
    Xiao, Rui
    Feng, Jingang
    Zhao, Liujun
    [J]. OPTIK, 2013, 124 (23): : 6027 - 6033