Anthropomorphic reasoning about neuromorphic AGI safety

被引:1
|
作者
Jilk, David J. [1 ]
Herd, Seth J. [1 ]
Read, Stephen J. [2 ]
O'Reilly, Randall C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ECortex Inc, Westminster, CO 80021 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Artificial general intelligence; neuroscience; neuromorphic AGI; AI safety; COMPUTATIONAL MODELS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; PSYCHOLOGY; MECHANISMS; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1080/0952813X.2017.1354081
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
One candidate approach to creating artificial general intelligence (AGI) is to imitate the essential computations of human cognition. This process is sometimes called reverse-engineering the brain' and the end product called neuromorphic.' We argue that, unlike with other approaches to AGI, anthropomorphic reasoning about behaviour and safety concerns is appropriate and crucial in a neuromorphic context. Using such reasoning, we offer some initial ideas to make neuromorphic AGI safer. In particular, we explore how basic drives that promote social interaction may be essential to the development of cognitive capabilities as well as serving as a focal point for human-friendly outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1351
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reasoning about Safety and Progress Using Contracts
    Ben-Hafaiedh, Imene
    Graf, Susanne
    Quinton, Sophie
    [J]. FORMAL METHODS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2010, 6447 : 436 - 451
  • [2] Relations between Gaudiya Vaisnava Devotional Practices and Implicit and Explicit Anthropomorphic Reasoning about Krsna
    Chilcott, Travis
    Paloutzian, Raymond E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND CULTURE, 2016, 16 (1-2) : 107 - 121
  • [3] SAFECAP domain language for reasoning about safety and capacity
    Iliasov, Alexei
    Romanovsky, Alexander
    [J]. 2012 WORKSHOP ON DEPENDABLE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS/RECENT ADVANCES IN SOFTWARE DEPENDABILITY (WDTS-RASD 2012), 2012, : 1 - 10
  • [4] Reasoning about safety management policy in everyday terms
    Horlick-Jones, T.
    [J]. SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: THEORY, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1601 - 1607
  • [5] Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions
    Tolchinsky, Pancho
    Modgil, Sanjay
    Atkinson, Katie
    McBurney, Peter
    Cortes, Ulises
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 25 (02) : 209 - 259
  • [6] Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions
    Pancho Tolchinsky
    Sanjay Modgil
    Katie Atkinson
    Peter McBurney
    Ulises Cortés
    [J]. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2012, 25 : 209 - 259
  • [7] REASONING ABOUT SAFETY AND LIVENESS PROPERTIES FOR PROBABILISTIC PROCESSES
    CHRISTOFF, L
    CHRISTOFF, I
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1992, 652 : 342 - 355
  • [8] A Miniaturised Neuromorphic Tactile Sensor integrated with an Anthropomorphic Robot Hand
    Ward-Cherrier, Benjamin
    Conradt, Jorg
    Catalano, Manuel G.
    Bianchi, Matteo
    Lepora, Nathan F.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2020, : 9883 - 9889
  • [9] Reasoning about safety properties in a JVM-like environment
    Fong, Philip W. L.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 2007, 67 (2-3) : 278 - 300
  • [10] AGI Safety Literature Review
    Everitt, Tom
    Lea, Gary
    Hutter, Marcus
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 5441 - 5449