The collapse argument

被引:2
|
作者
Gottlieb, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Philosophy, Box 43092, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
Consciousness; The transitivity principle; Higher-Order theories of consciousness; First-Order theories of consciousness; Attention; Availability; Working memory; CONSCIOUSNESS; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11098-017-1003-5
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
We can divide philosophical theories of consciousness into two main camps: First-Order theories and Higher-Order theories. Like all Higher-Order theories, many First-Order theories are mentalistic theories of consciousness: they attempt to reduce a mental state's being consciousness using mental (but non-phenomenal) terms, such as being available to certain cognitive centers. I argue that mentalistic First-Order theories, once fully cashed out, collapse into some form of Higher-Order theory. I contend that not only are there general considerations in favor of this conclusion, but that the four most prominent mentalistic First-Order' theories are, in fact, Higher-Order theories in disguise. Given a strong assumption in favor of some form of mentalism, if this is right, what emerges is a powerful argument for the Higher-Order theory of consciousness.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条