共 2 条
Analysts' evaluations of acquisitions: Swedish survey evidence on IFRS knowledge and the use of accounting information for valuation purposes
被引:0
|作者:
Andersson, Patric
[1
]
Hellman, Niclas
[2
]
机构:
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Mkt & Strategy, POB 6501, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Accounting, POB 6501, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词:
Accounting knowledge;
Financial statement complexity;
IFRS;
Acquisition;
M&A;
Experience;
Valuation;
Financial analyst;
Understandability;
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS;
DETERMINANTS;
COMPLEXITY;
MARKET;
ABILITIES;
ACCURACY;
MODELS;
BIAS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100354
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Conceptual Framework emphasizes understandability, i.e. that users have a reasonable degree of relevant knowledge and an ability to study financial information diligently. This article reports results from an empirical study of Swedish financial analysts' knowledge of IFRS Standards in an area of high complexity (acquisitions) and their use of such information for company valuation purposes. The study comprises financial analysts with experience analyzing acquisitions. Yet we find that the median analyst only knew the standards "to some extent," which we interpret as a poorer knowledge level compared to the expected IFRS understandability level. We further find that IFRS knowledge varied considerably across the analysts. Higher IFRS knowledge was not associated with using more sophisticated valuation methods, even though such methods require inputs involving accounting complexities. Our results provide some support for higher IFRS knowledge being associated with higher use of acquisition-related IFRS information. This suggests that analysts' incentives to invest in accounting knowledge may be driven by factors other than those related to fundamental analysis. Our empirical study considers various aspects of the analyst decision context and the findings are discussed in relation to this context and the research literature. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文