Assessment of Technical Skills: Best Practices

被引:20
|
作者
May, Stephen A. [1 ]
Head, Stanley D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Vet Coll, Hatfield AL9 7TA, Herts, England
关键词
assessment; OSCE; OSPVE; clinical competence; Day; 1; skills; practical skills; STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; FINAL EXAMINATIONS; EXAMINATION OSCE; STANDARDS; PERFORMANCE; HEALTH; COMPETENCE; CHALLENGES; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.3138/jvme.37.3.258
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Assessment is an important aspect of veterinary education from the point of view of setting standards, driving learning, providing feedback, and reassuring society that veterinarians are competent to assume the responsibilities entrusted to them. However, no single format exists that can, by itself, assess the complex mixture of knowledge and skills essential to the veterinarian's role. The areas that are most challenging to assess are those involving behaviors and attitudes. These include the various technical skills required for diagnosis and treatment. One approach, aimed at retaining validity but improving reliability compared with traditional, more subjective methods, first described in medicine 35 years ago, is the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), which has been introduced into veterinary education as the Objective Structured Practical Veterinary Examination (OSPVE) and run at the Royal Veterinary College since 2004. This approach is good for the assessment of competence in relation to isolated techniques and whole procedures but has been criticized for the way in which these are tested out of context. However, further development of structured clinical assessments, such as the mini-Clinical Examination and the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills, may help address some of these limitations, and the use of multi-source feedback, particularly client feedback, may allow the further domains of professional behaviors, attitudes, and communication to be judged and developed.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 265
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Best Practices for Technical Reproducibility Assessment of Multiplex Immunofluorescence
    Laberiano-Fernandez, Caddie
    Hernandez-Ruiz, Sharia
    Rojas, Frank
    Parra, Edwin Roger
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 8
  • [2] Technical Reviews: Framing the Best of the Best Practices
    Holdaway, Jill
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE, 2009, : 115 - 127
  • [3] Assessment of technical surgical skills
    Grantcharov, TP
    Bardram, L
    Funch-Jensen, P
    Rosenberg, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 168 (03) : 139 - 144
  • [4] Scholarly and Best Practices in Assessment
    Poirier, Therese I.
    Wilhelm, Miranda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 82 (03) : 209 - 210
  • [5] Best Practices in Summative Assessment
    Tienson-Tseng H.L.
    ACS Symposium Series, 2019, 1337 : 219 - 243
  • [6] Best practices in literacy assessment
    Winograd, P
    Arrington, HJ
    BEST PRACTICES IN LITERACY INSTRUCTION, 1999, : 210 - 241
  • [7] Best practices in summative assessment
    Kibble, Jonathan D.
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2017, 41 (01) : 110 - 119
  • [8] Development of a Competency Level Technical Skills Assessment: the General Surgery Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills
    Halwani, Yasmin
    Sachdeva, Ajit K.
    Blair, Patrice Gabler
    Satterthwaite, Lisa
    de Montbrun, Sandra
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 225 (04) : S173 - S174
  • [9] SOCIAL SKILLS IN SCHOOL-AGE-CHILDREN AND YOUTH - ISSUES AND BEST PRACTICES IN ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION
    WALKER, HM
    SCHWARZ, IE
    NIPPOLD, MA
    IRVIN, LK
    NOELL, JW
    TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS, 1994, 14 (03) : 70 - 82
  • [10] The Innovation Agent Task Force in the Automotive Skills Alliance (ASA) and Innovation Assessment Best Practices
    Aschbacher, Laura
    Johansen, Jorn
    Zelmenis, Mikus
    Messnarz, Richard
    Ekert, Damjan
    Breitenthaler, Jonathan
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, EUROSPI 2024, PT II, 2024, 2180 : 127 - 143