Delineator for Separated Bicycle Lanes at Sidewalk Level

被引:1
|
作者
Bentzen, Billie Louise [1 ]
Scott, Alan C. [2 ]
Myers, Linda [3 ]
机构
[1] Accessible Design Blind, Berlin, MA 01503 USA
[2] Elon Univ, Dept Psychol, Elon, NC USA
[3] Accessible Design Blind, Mill Valley, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0361198120922991
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The City and County of San Francisco sponsored research to identify a delineator for separated bicycle lanes at sidewalk level that is at least as detectable as truncated-dome detectable warning surface (DWS) by pedestrians with visual impairments, and that is not a barrier to pedestrians with mobility impairments. Tested as potential delineators were a 12-in. wide continuous raised trapezoid (0.75 in. high), and 12- and 24-in. wide installations of relatively wide flat-top bars (FTBs) and of a "corduroy" surface of narrower bars spaced more closely together (both 0.2 in. high). Thirty-one visually-impaired participants detected all five surfaces in addition to DWS, a total of six times each, from 90 degrees and 25 degrees approaches, with mean detection accuracies better than 90% for all surfaces (no significant differences). The long white cane intruded into the cycle track significantly less frequently with 24-in. wide surfaces. In a counterbalanced manner, participants also briefly stepped onto each surface eight times, each time identifying it as "domes,""bars," or "trapezoid." They identified the trapezoid significantly better (mean rate of correct identification = 98.8%) than all other surfaces. A majority of participants with vision disabilities preferred the trapezoid. Thirty participants with a variety of mobility impairments, using a variety of aids, crossed each surface four times with little significant difference from the DWS in effort, instability, and discomfort or pain. No surface was found to be a barrier to crossing. The trapezoidal surface was recommended as the delineator, although the 24-in. FTBs also performed very well.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 409
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 'SIDEWALK CHANGES LANES'
    BOSQUET, A
    PRAIRIE SCHOONER, 1976, 50 (01) : 56 - 57
  • [2] Recommended Widths for Separated Bicycle Lanes Considering Abreast Riding and Overtaking
    Yan, Xingchen
    Wang, Tao
    Ye, Xiaofei
    Chen, Jun
    Yang, Zhen
    Bai, Hua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [3] Influence Factor Analysis of Bicycle Free-Flow Speed for Determining the Design Speeds of Separated Bicycle Lanes
    Yan, Xingchen
    Chen, Jun
    Bai, Hua
    Wang, Tao
    Yang, Zhen
    INFORMATION, 2020, 11 (10) : 1 - 15
  • [4] Classification Criteria and Application of Level of Service for Bicycle Lanes in China
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Fang, Xueli
    Ye, Jianhong
    Luttinen, Tapio
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2662) : 116 - 124
  • [5] Bicycle lanes in Toronto
    Macbeth, AG
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 1999, 69 (04): : 38 - +
  • [6] Bicycle and motor vehicle operations on wide curb lanes, bicycle lanes, and paved shoulders
    Harkey, DL
    Stewart, JR
    TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND TRAFFIC SAFETY IN THE 21ST CENTURY: CHALLENGES, INNOVATIONS, AND OPPORTUNITIES, 1997, : 139 - 145
  • [7] Safety impacts of bicycle lanes
    Smith Jr., Robert L.
    Walsh, Thomas
    Transportation Research Record, 1988, (1168) : 49 - 56
  • [8] Bike Lanes Are White Lanes: Bicycle Advocacy and Urban Planning
    Pritchard, James A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY, 2018, 23 (04) : 903 - 904
  • [9] Bike Lanes Are White Lanes: Bicycle Advocacy and Urban Planning
    Oosterhuis, Harry
    TRANSFERS-INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF MOBILITY STUDIES, 2018, 8 (01) : 150 - 152
  • [10] Bike Lanes are White Lanes: Bicycle Advocacy and Urban Planning
    Latham, Alan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (01) : 202 - 203