Renewable energy policy formulation for electricity generation in the United States

被引:24
|
作者
Okioga, Irene Teshamulwa [1 ]
Wu, Jy [1 ]
Sireli, Yesim [1 ]
Hendren, Heather [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
关键词
Renewable energy; Energy policy; Energy ranking/prioritization; Energy portfolio; Analytic Hierarchy Process; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; SYSTEM; WIND; INVESTMENTS; SELECTION; SOLAR; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.008
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
While the United States (U.S.) has state-level policies that support renewable energy development, the country does not currently have any federal-level renewable energy policies that are formulated to include national renewable electricity targets. U.S. renewable energy policies include state-level renewable energy portfolio standards (RPSes), which stipulate the minimum renewable electricity that local utilities should provide, the proposed Clean Power Plan, which sets state-by-state targets for emission reduction by 2030, and the Clean Energy Act of 2007, which includes provisions that aim to increase energy efficiency and renewable fuel production. As the RPSes are established at a state level, they have varying renewable energy targets and related timelines that cannot readily be translated into federal law. This study uses an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to propose national targets for renewable electricity, by first reviewing electrical energy potentials based on the geographic areas defined by the U.S. Census Bureau regions, and then establishing regional and national renewable electricity goals. The goals are based on a quadruple-bottom-line approach (4P) considering technical or "progress", social or "people", economical or "profits" and environmental or "planet" factors. The study proposes a model for selecting mandates versus incentives for the renewable electricity alternatives using a benefit/cost ratio computed from the AHP analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 384
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of state and federal policy on renewable electricity generation capacity in the United States
    Mullen, Jeffrey D.
    Dong, Luran
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 105
  • [2] UK policy for electricity generation from renewable energy
    Doddrell, J
    [J]. WIND ENERGY 2000: BUILDING THE 10(PERCENT), 2001, : 11 - 13
  • [3] Incentives for renewable energy generation in the United States
    Kreith, F
    Foster, B
    Brown, M
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1996, 9 (1-4) : 1081 - 1085
  • [4] Subsidy schemes of renewable energy policy for electricity generation in Thailand
    Keyuraphan, S.
    Thanarak, P.
    Ketjoy, N.
    Rakwichian, W.
    [J]. ISEEC, 2012, 32 : 440 - 448
  • [5] Renewable Electricity Futures for the United States
    Mai, Trieu
    Hand, M. Maureen
    Baldwin, Samuel F.
    Wiser, Ryan H.
    Brinkman, Greg L.
    Denholm, Paul
    Arent, Doug J.
    Porro, Gian
    Sandor, Debra
    Hostick, Donna J.
    Milligan, Michael
    DeMeo, Edgar A.
    Bazilian, Morgan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 5 (02) : 372 - 378
  • [6] Analysis of renewable energy development to power generation in the United States
    Aslani, Alireza
    Wong, Kau-Fui V.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 63 : 153 - 161
  • [7] Electricity generation from renewable energy
    Benard, Michel
    [J]. Renewable energy, 1998, 15 (1 -4 pt 1): : 264 - 269
  • [9] Envisioning a renewable electricity future for the United States
    Mai, Trieu
    Mulcahy, David
    Hand, M. Maureen
    Baldwin, Samuel F.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 65 : 374 - 386
  • [10] Looking the wrong way: Bias, renewable electricity, and energy modelling in the United States
    Gilbert, Alexander Q.
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 94 : 533 - 541