The evidence-based practice profiles of academic and clinical staff involved in pre-registration nursing students' education: A cross sectional survey of US and UK staff

被引:36
|
作者
Upton, Penney [1 ]
Scurlock-Evans, Laura [1 ]
Williamson, Kathleen [2 ]
Rouse, Joanne [1 ]
Upton, Dominic [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Worcester, Inst Hlth & Soc, Henwick Grove WR2 6AJ, Worcester, England
[2] Widener Univ, Sch Nursing, Chester, PA 19013 USA
[3] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
关键词
Evidence-based practice; Evidence-based nursing; Evidence-based nursing practice; Nursing education; Nursing faculty; Survey methodology; QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; PRACTICE QUESTIONNAIRE; RESPONSE RATES; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; NURSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.006
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Competency in evidence-based practice (EBP) is a requirement for graduate nurses. Despite a growing body of research exploring the EBP profiles of students, little research has explored the EBP profiles of nurse educators. Objectives: To explore: the differences/similarities in the EBP profiles of US and UK clinical and academic faculty; the barriers nurse educators experience when teaching EBP; the impact of postgraduate education on EBP profile and; what nurse educators perceive "success" in implementing and teaching EBP to be. Design: A cross-sectional online survey design was employed. Settings: Two Universities delivering undergraduate nursing education in the US and UK in partnership with large hospital systems, small community hospitals, community settings, and independent sector health organisations. Participants: Eighty-one nurse educators working in academic and clinical contexts in the US and UK (US academic = 12, US clinical = 17, UK academic = 9, UK clinical = 43) were recruited opportunistically. Methods: Participants were emailed a weblink to an online survey, comprising demographic questions, the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire and open-ended questions about EBP barriers, facilitators and successes. Results: Quantitative results indicated that academic faculty scored significantly higher on knowledge and skills of EBP, than clinical faculty, but revealed no other significant differences on EBP use or attitudes, or between US and UK professionals. Participants with postgraduate training scored significantly higher on EBP knowledge/skills, but not EBP attitudes or use. Qualitative findings identified key themes relating to EBP barriers and facilitators, including: Evidence-, organisational-, and teaching-related issues. Perceptions of successes in EBP were also described. Conclusions: Nurse educators working in the UK and US face similar EBP barriers to teaching and implementation, but view it positively and use it frequently. Clinical staff may require extra support to maintain their EBP knowledge and skills in comparison to staff working in academic contexts. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 85
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical staff as mentors in pre-registration undergraduate nursing education: students' perceptions of the mentors' roles and responsibilities
    Chow, FLW
    Suen, LKP
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2001, 21 (05) : 350 - 358
  • [2] To embed or not to embed? A longitudinal study exploring the impact of curriculum design on the evidence-based practice profiles of UK pre-registration nursing students
    Scurlock-Evans, Laura
    Upton, Penney
    Rouse, Joanne
    Upton, Dominic
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 58 : 12 - 18
  • [3] Pre-registration education: developing confidence in evidence-based practice
    Page, F.
    Payne, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2016, 79 : 110 - 111
  • [4] How do university education and clinical experience influence pre-registration nursing students' infection control practice? A descriptive, cross sectional survey
    Hinkin, Jonathan
    Cutter, Jayne
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2014, 34 (02) : 196 - 201
  • [5] Best practice in clinical simulation education are we there yet? A cross-sectional survey of simulation in Australian and New Zealand pre-registration nursing education
    Bogossian, Fiona
    Cooper, Simon
    Kelly, Michelle
    Levett-Jones, Tracy
    McKenna, Lisa
    Slark, Julia
    Seaton, Philippa
    COLLEGIAN, 2018, 25 (03) : 327 - 334
  • [6] Interprofessional education (IPE) in clinical practice for pre-registration nursing students: A structured literature review
    Lim, Daphne A. F. N.
    Noble-Jones, Rhian
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 68 : 218 - 225
  • [7] Predictors of health of pre-registration nursing and midwifery students: Findings from a cross-sectional survey
    Deasy, Christine
    Coughlan, Barry
    Pironom, Julie
    Jourdan, Didier
    Mannix-McNamara, Patricia
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 36 : 427 - 433
  • [8] Learning style preferences of Australian accelerated postgraduate pre-registration nursing students: A cross-sectional survey
    McKenna, Lisa
    Copnell, Beverley
    Butler, Ashleigh E.
    Lau, Rosalind
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2018, 28 : 280 - 284
  • [9] Students' evaluation of professional experience placement quality in a pre-registration nursing programme: A cross-sectional survey
    Chu, Ginger
    Pitt, Victoria
    Cant, Robyn
    Johnson, Amanda
    Inder, Kerry
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 75
  • [10] The role of universities in attracting male students on to pre-registration nursing programmes: An electronic survey of UK higher education institutions
    Clifton, Andrew
    Higman, Jo
    Stephenson, John
    Navarro, Alfonso R.
    Welyczko, Nikki
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 71 : 111 - 115