EuroSCORE II†

被引:2038
|
作者
Nashef, Samer A. M. [1 ]
Roques, Francois [2 ]
Sharples, Linda D. [3 ]
Nilsson, Johan [4 ]
Smith, Christopher [1 ]
Goldstone, Antony R. [5 ]
Lockowandt, Ulf [6 ]
机构
[1] Papworth Hosp, Cambridge CB23 3RE, England
[2] Univ Hosp Ctr CHU, Fort De France, Martinique, France
[3] MRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England
[4] Skane Univ Hosp, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Lund, Sweden
[5] Castle Hill Hosp, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
[6] Karolinska Hosp, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Risk assessment; EuroSCORE; Cardiac surgery; Mortality; OPERATIVE RISK-EVALUATION; CARDIAC-SURGERY; EUROPEAN SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; MORTALITY; CIRRHOSIS; SCORES;
D O I
10.1093/ejcts/ezs043
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To update the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) risk model. A dedicated website collected prospective risk and outcome data on 22 381 consecutive patients undergoing major cardiac surgery in 154 hospitals in 43 countries over a 12-week period (May-July 2010). Completeness and accuracy were validated during data collection using mandatory field entry, error and range checks and after data collection using summary feedback confirmation by responsible officers and multiple logic checks. Information was obtained on existing EuroSCORE risk factors and additional factors proven to influence risk from research conducted since the original model. The primary outcome was mortality at the base hospital. Secondary outcomes were mortality at 30 and 90 days. The data set was divided into a developmental subset for logistic regression modelling and a validation subset for model testing. A logistic risk model (EuroSCORE II) was then constructed and tested. Compared with the original 1995 EuroSCORE database (in brackets), the mean age was up at 64.7 (62.5) with 31% females (28%). More patients had New York Heart Association class IV, extracardiac arteriopathy, renal and pulmonary dysfunction. Overall mortality was 3.9% (4.6%). When applied to the current data, the old risk models overpredicted mortality (actual: 3.9%; additive predicted: 5.8%; logistic predicted: 7.57%). EuroSCORE II was well calibrated on testing in the validation data subset of 5553 patients (actual mortality: 4.18%; predicted: 3.95%). Very good discrimination was maintained with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.8095. Cardiac surgical mortality has significantly reduced in the last 15 years despite older and sicker patients. EuroSCORE II is better calibrated than the original model yet preserves powerful discrimination. It is proposed for the future assessment of cardiac surgical risk.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 745
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uninformative and misleading comparison of EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II
    Collins, Gary S.
    Le Manach, Yannick
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (02) : 399 - 400
  • [2] Calibration of EuroSCORE II
    Collins, Gary S.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 43 (03) : 654 - 654
  • [3] Uninformative and misleading comparison of EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II Reply
    Kieser, Teresa M.
    Rose, M. Sarah
    Head, Stuart
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (02) : 400 - 400
  • [4] Clinical Performance of the EuroSCORE II Compared with the Previous EuroSCORE Iterations
    Velicki, Lazar
    Cemerlic-Adjic, Nada
    Pavlovic, Katica
    Mihajlovic, Bojan B.
    Bankovic, Dragic
    Mihajlovic, Bogoljub
    Fabri, Miklos
    [J]. THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2014, 62 (04): : 288 - 297
  • [5] Design flaws in EuroSCORE II
    Collins, Gary S.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 43 (04) : 871 - 871
  • [6] Validation of EuroSCORE II in Spain
    Garcia-Valentin, Antonio
    Bernabeu, Eduardo
    Pereda, Daniel
    Josa, Miguel
    Maria Cortina, Jose
    Mestres, Carlos A.
    Silva, Jacobo
    Llamas, Patricio
    Otero, Eduardo
    Fernandez, Angel L.
    [J]. CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2014, 21 (04): : 246 - 251
  • [7] Should EuroSCORE II be simplified?
    Bryony M. Mearns
    [J]. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2012, 9 (12) : 673 - 673
  • [8] The validity of the original EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II in patients over the age of seventy
    Poullis, Michael
    Pullan, Mark
    Chalmers, John
    Mediratta, Neeraj
    [J]. INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 20 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [9] What are the performance and limitations of EuroSCORE II?
    Provenchere, S.
    Bouleti, C.
    Dilly, M. -P.
    Depoix, J. -P.
    Namane, R. Ait
    Longrois, D.
    Iung, B.
    [J]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2013, 32 : A378 - A378
  • [10] Sampling time error in EuroSCORE II
    Poullis, Michael
    Fabri, Brian
    Pullan, Mark
    Chalmers, John
    [J]. INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 14 (05) : 640 - 641