Bilattice logic of epistemic actions and knowledge

被引:3
|
作者
Bakhtiari, Zeinab [1 ]
van Ditmarsch, Hans [1 ]
Rivieccio, Umberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lorraine, LORIA, CNRS, Nancy, France
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, DIMAp, Natal, RN, Brazil
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamic epistemic logic; Bilattices; Modal logic; Algebraic models; Duality; SEMANTICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apal.2020.102790
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Baltag, Moss, and Solecki proposed an expansion of classical modal logic, called logic of epistemic actions and knowledge (EAK), in which one can reason about knowledge and change of knowledge. Kurz and Palmigiano showed how duality theory provides a flexible framework for modeling such epistemic changes, allowing one to develop dynamic epistemic logics on a weaker propositional basis than classical logic (for example an intuitionistic basis). In this paper we show how the techniques of Kurz and Palmigiano can be further extended to define and axiomatize a bilattice logic of epistemic actions and knowledge (BEAK). Our propositional basis is a modal expansion of the well-known four-valued logic of Belnap and Dunn, which is a system designed for handling inconsistent as well as potentially conflicting information. These features, we believe, make our framework particularly promising from a computer science perspective. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Epistemic Logic: A Survey of the Logic of Knowledge
    Mirus, Christopher V.
    [J]. REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS, 2007, 60 (04): : 878 - 882
  • [2] Epistemic logic: A survey of the logic of knowledge
    Battaly, Heather
    [J]. MIND, 2008, 117 (465) : 205 - 210
  • [3] Epistemic Games in Modal Logic: joint Actions, Knowledge and Preferences All Together
    Lorini, Emiliano
    Schwarzentruber, Francois
    Herzig, Andreas
    [J]. LOGIC, RATIONALITY, AND INTERACTION, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5834 : 212 - 226
  • [4] Dynamic Epistemic Logic with Communication Actions
    Folhadela Benevides, Mario Roberto
    Saab Lima, Isaque Macalam
    [J]. ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2019, 344 : 67 - 82
  • [5] Bilattice Logic for Rough Sets
    Nakayama, Yotaro
    Akama, Seiki
    Murai, Tetsuya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATICS, 2020, 24 (06) : 774 - 784
  • [6] Bilattice Logic for Rough Sets
    Nakayama, Yotaro
    Akama, Seiki
    Murai, Tetsuya
    [J]. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 2020, 24 (06): : 774 - 784
  • [7] A Separation Logic with Histories of Epistemic Actions as Resources
    van Ditmarsch, Hans
    Galmiche, Didier
    Gawek, Marta
    [J]. LOGIC, LANGUAGE, INFORMATION, AND COMPUTATION, WOLLIC 2023, 2023, 13923 : 161 - 177
  • [8] Bilattice logic properly displayed
    Greco, Giuseppe
    Liang, Fei
    Palmigiano, Alessandra
    Rivieccio, Umberto
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 363 : 138 - 155
  • [9] Knowledge and belief in dynamic epistemic logic
    Soler-Toscano, Fernando
    [J]. ANDAMIOS, 2023, 20 (53): : 205 - 232
  • [10] Epistemic Łukasiewicz logic of partial knowledge
    Antonio Di Nola
    Revaz Grigolia
    Gaetano Vitale
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2022, 26 : 9823 - 9830