Life Cycle Assessment of a Modern Northern Great Plains U.S. Swine Production Facility

被引:11
|
作者
Stone, James J. [1 ]
Dollarhide, Christopher R. [1 ]
Jinka, Ramith [1 ]
Thaler, Robert C. [2 ]
Hostetler, Chris E. [2 ]
Clay, David E. [3 ]
机构
[1] S Dakota Sch Mines & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Rapid City, SD 57701 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Anim & Range Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[3] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
swine; life cycle assessment; swine production; facility operations; climate change; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; PIG PRODUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; UNITED-STATES; MANURE;
D O I
10.1089/ees.2010.0051
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A life cycle assessment (LCA) model was developed to determine the environmental impacts associated with a modeled modern Northern Great Plains U.S. swine production facility. This region has experienced significant growth (2.5 million head increase since 1996) and currently accounts for 13% of U.S. swine herd. The LCA model followed a "gate-to-gate" perspective focusing solely on feed manufacturing and swine production facility operations and did not include feedstuff production or abattoir and other postproduction supply chain processes. Model input data were normalized using a head of swine functional unit and were segregated into two operation processes and associated subprocesses: feed manufacturing including electricity use and completed feed transport, and production facility operations including manure handling and storage, enteric emissions, electricity generation and propane production, and water extraction. Four distinct operation scenarios were modeled, including normal operations, use of feed-based antimicrobials, a 50% reduced completed feed transportation distance, and a 30% increased use of renewable energy for all operations. For the normal operations scenario, climate change impacts were predominantly attributed to swine enteric emissions (331.6 kg CO(2) eq) and manure storage and handling (53.4 kg CO(2) eq), whereas antimicrobial use reduced total climate change impacts by 3.7%. Manure storage and handling resulted in the greatest contribution toward marine eutrophication (0.048 kg N eq) and terrestrial acidification (1.29 kg SO(2) eq) impacts, whereas production facility electricity and heating resulted in the greatest terrestrial ecotoxicity (0.00060 kg 1,4-DB eq) and freshwater eutrophication (0.00016 kg P eq) impacts observed. Results from this LCA model provide Northern Great Plains swine producers and environmental practitioners with techniques that can be used to improve swine production efficiencies and identify opportunities for a future carbon-constrained and sustainability-aware marketplace.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1018
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The life cycle impacts of feed for modern grow-finish Northern Great Plains US swine production
    Stone, James J.
    Dollarhide, Christopher R.
    Benning, Jennifer L.
    Carlson, C. Gregg
    Clay, David E.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 106 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [2] Heat and moisture production rates of a modern u.s. swine breeding, gestation, and farrowing facility
    Xin, Hongwei, 1600, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (57):
  • [3] Life-Cycle Assessment of the Beef Cattle Production System for the Northern Great Plains, USA
    Lupo, Christopher D.
    Clay, David E.
    Benning, Jennifer L.
    Stone, James J.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2013, 42 (05) : 1386 - 1394
  • [4] Switchgrass Biomass Simulation at Diverse Sites in the Northern Great Plains of the U.S.
    J. R. Kiniry
    M. R. Schmer
    K. P. Vogel
    R. B. Mitchell
    BioEnergy Research, 2008, 1 : 259 - 264
  • [5] Determination of environmental impacts of antimicrobial usage for US Northern Great Plains swine-production facilities: a life-cycle assessment approach
    James J. Stone
    Katherine R. Aurand
    Christopher R. Dollarhide
    Ramith Jinka
    Robert C. Thaler
    David E. Clay
    Sharon A. Clay
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 27 - 39
  • [6] Determination of environmental impacts of antimicrobial usage for US Northern Great Plains swine-production facilities: a life-cycle assessment approach
    Stone, James J.
    Aurand, Katherine R.
    Dollarhide, Christopher R.
    Jinka, Ramith
    Thaler, Robert C.
    Clay, David E.
    Clay, Sharon A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (01): : 27 - 39
  • [7] Life-cycle assessment in U.S. codes and standards
    Lorenz, E., 1600, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (59):
  • [8] Comparative Farm-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Oilseed Feedstocks in the Northern Great Plains
    Devin Moeller
    Heidi L. Sieverding
    James J. Stone
    BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality, 2017, 2 (4):
  • [9] Roles of tropospheric and boundary layer forcing in the diurnal cycle of convection in the U.S. southern great plains
    Zhang, GJ
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (24)
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions associated with production and consumption of peanut butter in the U.S.
    McCarty, James A., 1741, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (57):