Realistic evaluation of source terms for steam generator tube rupture accidents

被引:2
|
作者
Shin, Hoyoung [1 ]
Jae, Moosung [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Nucl Engn, 418 HIT,222 Wangsimni Ro, Seoul 04763, South Korea
关键词
Decomposition Event Tree (DET); Source Term Category (STC); Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA); Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR) without fission product release;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108559
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In the existing Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) model, all the Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR) sequences have been assumed to have identical fission product release characteristics without considering the sequences of no source term release resulting in a conservative evaluation. Since the Korean Nuclear Safety Act was revised in 2016, a realistic method that can reasonably evaluate the risk became needed to satisfy the PSA targets. Therefore, a new method is proposed to improve the Level 2 PSA model (decomposition event tree, containment event tree, source term category logic diagram) that can identify the SGTR sequences without fission product release to the environment. The sequences are classified by dividing the Source Term Category (STC) of SGTRs into SGTR_CON (containment) and SGTR_ENV (environment). If fission product is trapped inside the containment building and not released to the environment, it is classified as SGTR_CON. Otherwise it is classified as SGTR_ENV. About 72% of the existing STC for SGTR is treated as SGTR_CON, which does not release fission product to the environment. If SGTR STCs are divided into SGTR-CON and SGTR-ENV, then a more reasonable source term evaluation of SGTR sequences is expected. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of steam generator tube rupture accidents for the development of mitigation strategies
    Bang, Jungjin
    Choi, Gi Hyeon
    Jerng, Dong-Wook
    Bae, Sung-Won
    Jang, Sunghyon
    Ha, Sang Jun
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 54 (01) : 152 - 161
  • [2] Analysis of a steam generator tube rupture under realistic initial and boundary conditions
    Sarkadi, P.
    Schaffrath, A.
    KERNTECHNIK, 2009, 74 (1-2) : 83 - 87
  • [3] Evaluation of aerosol retention inside a steam generator under steam generator tube rupture accident conditions
    Kim, Sung Il
    Kang, Chang Wan
    Kim, Jin Hyeok
    Park, Ki Han
    Oh, Jeong Yun
    Lee, Byeong Hee
    Ha, Kwang Soon
    Hong, Seong Ho
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2022, 396
  • [4] Experimental models of medium break loss of coolant accidents with and without steam generator tube rupture
    Marn, J
    Delic, M
    Skerget, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 2003, 80 (10) : 737 - 744
  • [5] Steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) scenarios
    Auvinen, A
    Jokiniemi, JK
    Lähde, A
    Routamo, T
    Lundström, P
    Tuomisto, H
    Dienstbier, J
    Güntay, S
    Suckow, D
    Dehbi, A
    Slootman, M
    Herranz, L
    Peyres, V
    Polo, J
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2005, 235 (2-4) : 457 - 472
  • [6] Structural integrity evaluation method for overheating rupture of FBR steam generator tube
    Machida, H
    Yoshioka, N
    Ogo, H
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2002, 212 (1-3) : 183 - 192
  • [7] STEAM-GENERATOR SECONDARY PH DURING A STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE RUPTURE
    ADAMS, JP
    PETERSON, ES
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 102 (03) : 304 - 312
  • [8] The effect of tube rupture location on the consequences of multiple steam generator tube rupture event
    Jeong, JH
    Kweon, YC
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2002, 29 (15) : 1809 - 1826
  • [9] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE RUPTURE EFFECTS ON A LOCA
    LACHANCE, JL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1979, 32 (JUN): : 495 - 496
  • [10] Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR) mitigation concept
    Rouault, N
    Guignard, JP
    Nicaise, N
    Conrads, HJ
    Neumann, R
    Stelzer, W
    EUROPEAN PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR EPR, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 204 - 207