Foreign Direct Investment and Trade-Between Complementarity and Substitution. Evidence from European Union Countries

被引:5
|
作者
Voica, Marian Catalin [1 ]
Panait, Mirela [1 ,2 ]
Hysa, Eglantina [3 ]
Cela, Arjona [3 ]
Manta, Otilia [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Petr Gas Univ Ploiesti, Dept Cybernet Econ Informat Finance & Accounting, Ploiesti 100680, Romania
[2] Romanian Acad, Inst Natl Econ, Bucharest 050711, Romania
[3] Epoka Univ, Dept Econ, Tirana 1039, Albania
[4] Romanian Amer Univ, Dept Res, Bucharest 012101, Romania
[5] Romanian Acad, Financial & Monetary Res Ctr Victor Slavescu, Bucharest 050711, Romania
关键词
foreign direct investment; trade; complementarity; substitution; EU countries; economic growth; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FDI EVIDENCE; DETERMINANTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/jrfm14110559
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This aim of this work is to study the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade. FDI is a driving force for economic growth for host countries. The positive effects of FDI are seen in many aspects of the economy. However, the implications of FDI on foreign trade are questionable. Therefore, this study uses a Granger causality technique to test whether the relationship between FDI and foreign trade is complementary or substitutive. The findings of this study indicate that this relationship appears to be complementary, and FDI investment does cause an increase in trade flow in the countries that are taken into consideration. This research aims to make a comparison between the relations of FDI flows of three groups of countries from the European Union (EU)-Romania and Bulgaria, the Visegrad Group and the Euro area-for the period of 2005 to 2019. However, the results indicate that this link between the variables is not yet found for the three group of countries, and further research is required in this aspect. This leads to the conclusion that the FDI impact on foreign trade of the host country depends on the type of investment and absorptive capacity of the receiver, the economic development of host and home countries, and not every type of FDI leads to more trade.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South East European countries and new European Union member states
    Dauti, Bardhyl
    [J]. ZBORNIK RADOVA EKONOMSKOG FAKULTETA U RIJECI-PROCEEDINGS OF RIJEKA FACULTY OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (01): : 63 - 89
  • [2] Foreign direct investment, trade integration and the home bias: evidence from the European Union
    Martinez-San Roman, Valeriano
    Bengoa, Marta
    Sanchez-Robles, Blanca
    [J]. EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 50 (01) : 197 - 229
  • [3] Foreign direct investment, trade integration and the home bias: evidence from the European Union
    Valeriano Martínez-San Román
    Marta Bengoa
    Blanca Sánchez-Robles
    [J]. Empirical Economics, 2016, 50 : 197 - 229
  • [4] The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment from Major Source Countries on Turkish Trade with the European Union
    Cetin, Rahmi
    Taban, Sami
    [J]. SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2009, 4 (02) : 45 - 55
  • [5] New Empirical Evidence on the Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment in the European Union Countries
    Donath, Liliana
    Milos, Laura Raisa
    Milos, Marius Cristian
    [J]. EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2020, 68 (01): : 69 - 84
  • [6] THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND MEXICO - IMPACT ON TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
    de Luna Barrios, Antonio Manrique
    [J]. REVISTA CHILENA DE DERECHO, 2016, 43 (01): : 115 - 135
  • [7] The European Union and its neighboring countries: The economic geography of trade, Foreign Direct Investment and development
    Crescenzi, Riccardo
    Petrakos, George
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2016, 34 (04): : 581 - 591
  • [8] European Union Foreign Direct Investment Outflows to ASEAN Countries
    Drzymala, Agnieszka
    [J]. COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC RESEARCH-CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, 2013, 16 (01): : 5 - 19
  • [9] The determinants of foreign direct investment outflows from the European Union countries.
    Mihci, Hakan
    Cagatay, Selim
    Koska, Onur A.
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2011, 31 (03): : 2653 - 2666
  • [10] Foreign Direct Investment and the Profit Rate: Empirical Evidence from the European Union
    Groumpos, Dimitris
    Economakis, George
    [J]. REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (04) : 520 - 541