Hyoscine Butylbromide for the Management of Death Rattle: Sooner Rather Than Later

被引:26
|
作者
Mercadante, Sebastiano [1 ]
Marinangeli, Franco
Masedu, Francesco
Valenti, Marco [2 ]
Russo, Domenico [3 ]
Ursini, Laura [4 ]
Massici, Alessia [3 ]
Aielli, Federica [5 ]
机构
[1] La Maddalena Canc Ctr, Main Reg Ctr Pain Relief & Support Palliat Care, Palermo, Sicily, Italy
[2] Univ Aquila, Sect Clin Epidemiol & Environm Med, Dept Biotechnol & Appl Clin Sci, Laquila, Italy
[3] San Marco Hosp & Palliat Care, Latina, Italy
[4] ASL 01 Avezzano Sulmona Aquila, Casa Margherita Hosp, Laquila, Italy
[5] Univ Aquila, Dept Appl Clin Sci & Biotechnol, Laquila, Italy
关键词
Cancer patient; palliative care; death rattle; dying process; anticholinergics; hyoscine butylbromide; ILL CANCER-PATIENTS; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.08.018
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Death rattle (DR) is a dramatic sign in the dying patient. Existing studies with anticholinergic agents are controversial, as this class of drugs has been commonly administered without considering the rationale of the mechanism of action. A meaningful use of these drugs may provide a better outcome. Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of hyoscine butylbromide (HB), given prophylactically in comparison with HB administered once DR occurs. Methods. Dying patients having a score of >= 3 in the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scaledpalliative version were included in the study. HB (60 mg/day) was given when DR occurred (Group 1) or as pre-emptive treatment (Group 2). The onset of DR (death rattle free time) and intensity of DR were recorded at intervals until death. Results. Eighty-one and 51 patients were randomized to Group 1 and 2, respectively. Patients in Group 2 survived longer than those in Group 1 (P < 0.05). DR occurred in 49 (60.5%) and three patients (5.9%) in Group 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.001). A significant difference in the number of patients reporting DR was found at intervals examined (30 minutes, one hour, and then every six hours until death [P = 0.001]). In Group 1 and 2, DR free time was 20.4 (20.5) and 27.3 hours (25.2), respectively (P = 0.001). In Group 1, the treatment was considered effective in 10 patients (20.4%) only, after a mean of 14.4 hours (SD 8.57). Conclusion. The prophylactic use of HB is an efficient method to prevent DR, whereas the late administration produces a limited response, confirming data from traditional studies performed with anticholinergics. This could be considered a new paradigm to manage a difficult and dramatic sign, such as DR. (C) 2018 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 907
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条