Assessing cross-cultural validity of scales: A methodological review and illustrative example

被引:33
|
作者
Beckstead, Jason W. [1 ]
Yang, Chiu-Yueh [2 ]
Lengacher, Cecile A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Nursing, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Grad Inst Nursing, Fu Jen Univ, Coll Med,Sch Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
measurement invariance; women's role strain; structural equation models;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.09.002
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
In this article, we assessed the cross-cultural validity of the Women's Role Strain Inventory (WRSI), a multi-item instrument that assesses the degree of strain experienced by women who juggle the roles of working professional, student, wife and mother. Cross-cultural validity is evinced by demonstrating the measurement invariance of the WRSI. Measurement invariance is the extent to which items of multi-item scales function in the same way across different samples of respondents. We assessed measurement invariance by comparing a sample of working women in Taiwan with a similar sample from the United States. Structural equation models (SEMs) were employed to determine the invariance of the WRSI and to estimate the unique validity variance of its items. This article also provides nurse-researchers with the necessary underlying measurement theory and illustrates how SEMs may be applied to assess cross-cultural validity of instruments used in nursing research. Overall performance of the WRSI was acceptable but our analysis showed that some items did not display invariance properties across samples. Item analysis is presented and recommendations for improving the instrument are discussed. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 119
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability, validity, and methodological issues in assessing physical activity in a cross-cultural setting
    Mâsse, LC
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2000, 71 (02) : S54 - S58
  • [2] METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW OF CROSS-CULTURAL MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
    NATH, R
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1968, 20 (01) : 35 - 62
  • [3] Technology Readiness Index (TRI): Assessing Cross-Cultural Validity
    Meng, Juan
    Elliott, Kevin
    Hall, Mark
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL CONSUMER MARKETING, 2009, 22 (01) : 19 - 31
  • [4] Cross-cultural validity of the masculine and Feminine Gender Role Stress scales
    van Well, S
    Kolk, AM
    Arrindell, WA
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2005, 84 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [5] A cross-cultural methodological study of the uses of two common hedonic response scales
    Cox, DN
    Clark, MN
    Mialon, VS
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2001, 12 (02) : 119 - 131
  • [6] Assessing Cross-Cultural Competence: A Review of Available Tests
    Matsumoto, David
    Hwang, Hyisung C.
    JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 44 (06) : 849 - 873
  • [7] Fears of Compassion Scales: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validity Evidence for Use in Brazil
    Sandiléia Pfeiffer
    Natália Peixoto Pereira
    Carolina Saraiva de Macedo Lisboa
    Trends in Psychology, 2024, 32 (4) : 1460 - 1481
  • [8] Methodological rigour in cross-cultural research
    Bhui, K
    Bhugra, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 179 : 269 - 269
  • [9] Cross-cultural comparisons: methodological concerns
    Sievert, Lynnette Leidy
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2012, 19 (12): : 1289 - 1290
  • [10] Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: A Methodological Systematic Review
    Yu, Wenlong
    Chen, Dingbang
    Zheng, Jianhu
    Huang, Xiaoxia
    Ding, Xing
    Zhang, Luosheng
    Yin, Mengchen
    Huan, Quan
    Yang, Xinghai
    Ma, Junming
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 188 : 24 - 34