The utility of safety counseling in a pediatric emergency department

Objective. Pediatric injuries have a significant impact on the medical system, costing lives and disabling many survivors. Although injury-prevention measures do exist, they are underutilized. A majority of families do not consistently receive counseling by a primary care provider (PCP). We attempted to demonstrate the efficacy of counseling families who presented to a pediatric emergency department with unrelated medical complaints. Methods. A self-report questionnaire was administered to assess the home safety of patients 2 weeks to 12 years old presenting to the emergency department. Targeted counseling on areas noted to be unsafe was provided, and a 2-week follow-up telephone call was made to assess the effectiveness of the counseling. Information on previous counseling by a PCP was also collected and analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to determine significance and calculate odds ratios. Results. Thirty-seven percent of caregivers recalled receiving any counseling at a PCP visit. Caregivers who had received prior counseling by a PCP were significantly more likely to have a safe home environment. Patients who were English speaking were significantly more likely to have received safety counseling than their Spanish-speaking counterparts. One hundred fifty families received counseling in the emergency department, and 117 were eligible for follow-up. Of these families, 39% made a positive change in the safety of their child's environment at the 2-week telephone follow-up. Conclusions. Caregivers receiving counseling by a PCP are more likely to provide a safe home environment for their children. Spanish-speaking patients are at particularly high risk of not receiving counseling. Of caregivers reporting unsafe practices during an unrelated emergency-department encounter, targeted counseling made a positive impact on behavior after discharge.