Crisis management in high-reliability organizations: lessons from Brazilian air disasters

被引:5
|
作者
Meyer Jr, Victor [1 ]
Pina e Cunha, Miguel [2 ]
Mamedio, Diorgenes Falcao [3 ]
Nogueira, Danillo Prado [3 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana, Fac Business, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, Fac Business & Econ, Nova Sch Business & Econ, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Crisis management; Flight disasters; High-reliability; Complex systems; TECHNOLOGY; ACCIDENTS;
D O I
10.1108/DPM-08-2019-0245
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The focus of this study was to analyze crisis management in a context of high-reliability organizations (HRO) evidenced in two cases of Brazilian air disasters. Aspects of human and technological natures were examined, addressing the complex sociotechnical system. Design/methodology/approach This in-depth case study addressed the two most serious air disasters on Brazilian territory. The first case involved a midair collision between Gol Flight 1907 and the Legacy jet. In the second case, TAM flight 3054 had difficulty braking when landing at the airport and crashed into a building. Data were collected from official disaster documents. Findings The results revealed that the management and operational activities aimed to maintain the necessary conditions that prioritize a high level of reliability. High reliability mainly involves concern over failure, reluctance to accept simplified interpretations, sensitivity to operations, commitment to resilience and detailed structure specifications. Practical implications - The implications are based on alerting highly reliable organizations, emphasizing the focus on managing more reliably, resiliently and conscientiously. Changes will be required in the operations of organizations seeking to learn to manage unexpected events and respond quickly to continually improve the responsiveness of their services. Originality/value In the perspective of an intrinsic case study for crisis management in a context of HRO and disaster risk management, the originality of this study lies in its examination of the paradoxical nature of control within the systems of dangerous operations in complex organizations, as well as their contradictions in a high-reliability system.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 224
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations
    Roberts, KH
    Bea, R
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2001, 15 (03): : 70 - 78
  • [2] Learning From High-Reliability Organizations
    Prasanna, Prasanth
    Nagy, Paul
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 8 (10) : 725 - 726
  • [3] Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations - Executive commentary
    Bartles, DL
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2001, 15 (03): : 78 - 79
  • [4] Trust in high-reliability organizations
    Schoebel, Markus
    SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 2009, 48 (02): : 315 - 333
  • [5] MANAGING HIGH-RELIABILITY ORGANIZATIONS
    ROBERTS, KH
    CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1990, 32 (04) : 101 - 113
  • [6] From High-Reliability Organizations to High-Reliability Networks: The Dynamics of Network Governance in the Face of Emergency
    Berthod, Olivier
    Grothe-Hammer, Michael
    Mueller-Seitz, Gordon
    Raab, Joerg
    Sydow, Joerg
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2017, 27 (02) : 352 - 371
  • [7] Trust relations in high-reliability organizations
    Cox, Sue
    Jones, Bethan
    Collinson, David
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (05) : 1123 - 1138
  • [8] Process design in high-reliability organizations
    Sommer, K. -J.
    Kranz, J.
    Steffens, J.
    UROLOGE, 2014, 53 (05): : 645 - +
  • [9] Is There a Place for High-Reliability Organizations in Drilling?
    Thorogood, J. L.
    SPE DRILLING & COMPLETION, 2013, 28 (03) : 263 - 269
  • [10] Promoting a Culture of Civility in High-Reliability Organizations
    Murray, John S.
    Campbell, Jeannine
    Larson, Stacey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2025, 40 (02) : 64 - 66