Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease-the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study

被引:10
|
作者
van Poppelen, D. [1 ]
Sisodia, V. [1 ]
de Haan, R. J. [2 ]
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. [3 ]
Schuurman, P. R. [4 ]
Geurtsen, G. J. [5 ]
Berk, A. E. M. [6 ]
de Bie, R. M. A. [1 ]
Dijk, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Neurol, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Clin Res Unit, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Clin Epidemiol Biostat & Bioinform, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Neurosurg, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Med Psychol, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Parkinsons Dis Assoc Parkinson Vereniging, Kosterijland 12, Bunnik, Netherlands
关键词
Parkinson's disease; Deep brain stimulation; Continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion; Cost-effectiveness analyses; Patient preference trial; Randomized controlled trial; DOUBLE-BLIND; CARBIDOPA;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-020-1621-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significantly. In the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study, costs and effectiveness of DBS and CLI are compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with PD, to study whether higher costs of one of the therapies are justified by superiority of that treatment. Methods A prospective open label multicentre RCT is being performed, with ancillary patient preference observational arms. Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesias, or painful dystonia are eligible for inclusion. A total of 66 patients will be randomized. There is no minimal inclusion in the patient preference arms. The primary health economic outcomes are costs per unit on the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and costs per unit Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) at 12 months. The main clinical outcome is patient-reported quality of life measured with the PDQ-39 at 12 months. Patients will additionally be followed during 36 months after initiation of the study treatment. Discussion The INVEST trial directly compares the costs and effectiveness of the advanced therapies DBS and CLI.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条