Graft survival following living-donor renal transplantation: A comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids

被引:36
|
作者
Bunnapradist, S
Daswani, A
Takemoto, SK
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Immunogenet Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dumont Transplant Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Multiorgan Transplant Program, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000079965.62765.1A
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Registry databases offer the statistical power to analyze differences in graft survival rates that may not be detected in randomized clinical trials. This study analyses 2-year graft survival using tacrolimus (tac) or cyclosporine (CsA) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. Methods. Data reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing Renal Transplant Registry for living-donor kidney patients receiving a transplant during 1998 to 1999 were included. The primary end point was graft survival after adjustment for confounding variables. A Cox model multivariate analysis was used to adjust for potential confounding factors. Results. Patients receiving CsA-MMF (n=4,686) and tac-MMF (n=2,393) were included. Unadjusted all-cause 2-year graft survival rate was significantly higher with CsA-MMF than tac-MMF (94.3% vs. 92.2%, P=0.0006). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, risk of graft failure at 2 years was significantly higher in patients receiving tac-MMF versus CsA-MMF for both all-cause graft failure (hazards ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.49, P=0.002) and death-censored graft failure (HR 1.25,95% Cl 1.05-1.499 P=0.013). Other independent risk factors for graft failure were recipient or donor age greater than 55 years, female sex, pretransplant blood transfusions, one or two haplotype mismatches compared with zero haplotype mismatch, and panel reactive antibody (PRA) greater than 30%. Conclusions. Our findings demonstrate that 2-year renal allograft survival is significantly higher in living-donor recipients receiving CsA compared with tac as initial immunosuppression in combination with MMF.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety of reduced dose of mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation
    Kim, Hyeyoung
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Juyeun
    Kim, Joohyun
    Moon, Mi-Ra
    Jeong, Jaehong
    Lee, Jeong-Moo
    You, Tae Suk
    Suh, Suk-Won
    Park, Min-Su
    Choi, YoungRok
    Hong, Geun
    Lee, Hae Won
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 20 (03) : 291 - 299
  • [2] Influence of race on the outcome of laparoscopic harvested living living-donor kidney transplantation in the era of triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids.
    Wali, RK
    Blahut, S
    Ramos, E
    Drachenberg, C
    Lu, W
    Lakkis, J
    Bartlett, S
    Weir, MR
    Jacobs, SC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 : 565A - 565A
  • [3] Influence of race on the outcome of laparoscopic harvested living living-donor kidney transplantation in the era of triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids.
    Wali, RK
    Blahut, S
    Ramos, E
    Drachenberg, C
    Lu, W
    Lakkis, J
    Bartlett, S
    Weir, MR
    Jacobs, SC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 : 565A - 565A
  • [4] Pharmacokinetics of daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine and steroids in renal transplantation
    Pescovitz, MD
    Bumgardner, G
    Gaston, RS
    Kirkman, RL
    Light, S
    Patel, IH
    Nieforth, K
    Vincenti, F
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 17 (06) : 511 - 517
  • [5] Comparison of cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus in 39 recipients of living donor liver transplantation
    Tanaka, K
    Lake, J
    Villamil, F
    Levy, G
    Marotta, P
    Mies, S
    de Hemptinne, B
    Moench, C
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 11 (11) : 1395 - 1402
  • [6] Canadian multicentre trial of tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids versus neoral/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids in renal transplantation
    Busque, S
    Shoker, A
    Landsberg, D
    McAlister, V
    Halloran, P
    Shapiro, J
    Peets, J
    Schulz, M
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1266 - 1267
  • [7] Avoidance of cyclosporine in renal transplantation: Effects of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids
    Tran, HTB
    Acharya, MK
    McKay, DB
    Sayegh, MH
    Carpenter, CB
    Auchincloss, H
    Kirkman, RL
    Milford, EL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2000, 11 (10): : 1903 - 1909
  • [8] Comparison of cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus in 39 recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
    Tanaka, K
    Lake, J
    Villamil, F
    Levy, G
    Marotta, P
    Mies, S
    de Hemptinne, B
    Otto, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 185 - 185
  • [9] Comparison of Mizoribine and Mycophenolate Mofetil With a Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Retrospective Study in China
    Shi, Y.
    Liu, H.
    Chen, X. -G.
    Shen, Z. -Y.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2017, 49 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [10] Randomized comparative trial of mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus for living donor renal transplantation
    Takahara, Shiro
    Takahashi, Kota
    Akiyama, Takahiro
    Uchida, Kazuharu
    Tanabe, Kazunari
    Amada, Noritoshi
    Toma, Hiroshi
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 17 (06) : 899 - 904